Facts Are More Important Than Novelty
Facts Are More Important Than Novelty
复制标题
事实比新奇更重要
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Plucker
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Matthew C. Makel;J. Plucker
尽管教育研究越来越重视方法的严谨性，但该领域主要集中在实验设计上，而不是复制重要结果的价值。本研究分析了目前按5年影响因子排名的前100名教育期刊的完整出版历史，发现只有0.13%的教育文章是复制的。与之前医学研究的发现相反，但与心理学研究相似，大多数教育复制成功地复制了原始研究。然而，当原始文章和复制文章之间的作者没有重叠时，复制成功的可能性要小得多。研究结果强调了第三方直接复制在帮助教育研究提高其塑造教育政策和实践的能力方面的重要性。
Despite increased attention to methodological rigor in education research, the field has focused heavily on experimental design and not on the merit of replicating important results. The present study analyzed the complete publication history of the current top 100 education journals ranked by 5-year impact factor and found that only 0.13% of education articles were replications. Contrary to previous findings in medicine, but similar to psychology, the majority of education replications successfully replicated the original studies. However, replications were significantly less likely to be successful when there was no overlap in authorship between the original and replicating articles. The results emphasize the importance of third-party, direct replications in helping education research improve its ability to shape education policy and practice.
影响因子：
1.8
作者：
Klein, Richard A.;Ratliff, Kate A.;Nosek, Brian A.
通讯作者：
Nosek, Brian A.