Assessment of decoupling between rural settlement area and rural population in China
Assessment of decoupling between rural settlement area and rural population in China
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.02.002
复制
发表时间：
2014-07
期刊：
影响因子：
7.1
通讯作者：
Wei Song;Mingliang Liu
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Wei Song;Mingliang Liu
在中国，农村住区模式的改变至关重要，因为这些改变可能通过侵占生产性农田和水资源而影响农业的可持续性，并减少生物多样性。自2000年以来，快速的城市化以及随之而来的社会经济转型导致中国农村户籍人口（RRP）减少。这种变化的影响RRP对农村居民点面积（RSA）和这些措施之间的关系的人口和土地利用的塑造因素引起了广泛的研究兴趣。我们研究了RRP和RSA的变化，并使用解耦模型来分析它们之间的关系。我们发现，虽然RRP在中国增加了1.12%，在1996-2000年，它下降了4.91%，在2000-2005年。在1996-2000年和2000-2005年期间，登记注册收入分别增长了0.62%和0.09%。1996-2000年期间，由于农村住房从单层住房转变为多层住房，农村住房改革方案与农村住房改革方案略有脱钩。在2000-2005年期间，由于村庄空心化，农村登记制度实际上与农村登记制度有很大的负面脱钩，这主要是由双轨制的真实的财产制度（集体所有，但个人使用权）以及制度管理和社会经济因素造成的。在中国中西部地区，由于农村人口的省际流动，农村人口与农村人口政策的脱钩程度要高于东部地区。
In China, changes in rural settlement patterns are crucial because they may affect agricultural sustainability through encroachment on productive cropland and water resources and also reduce biodiversity. Rapid urbanization with accompanying socioeconomic transformation has resulted in decrease of the rural register population (RRP) in China since 2000. The effects of this change in RRP on rural settlement area (RSA) and the factors shaping the relationship between these measures of population and land use have attracted extensive research interest. We investigated the changes in RRP and RSA and used a decoupling model to analyze the relationship between them. We found that whereas RRP in China increased by 1.12% during 1996–2000, it decreased by 4.91% during 2000–2005. RSA increased by 0.62% and 0.09% during the periods 1996–2000 and 2000–2005, respectively. The RSA was slightly decoupled from RRP during 1996–2000 due to the shift in rural housing from one-floor houses to multi-floor houses. In the period 2000–2005, RSA was actually strongly negatively decoupled from RRP due to village-hollowing, which was driven mainly by a dual-track real property system (ownership by collectives, but use rights for individuals) as well as institutional–managerial and socioeconomic factors. In central and western China, the RSA was better able to be decoupled from RRP than in eastern China due to interprovincial rural migration.