A Century of International Relations Feminism: From World War I Women's Peace Pragmatism to the Women, Peace and Security Agenda
A Century of International Relations Feminism: From World War I Women's Peace Pragmatism to the Women, Peace and Security Agenda
复制标题
DOI：
10.1093/isq/sqx091
复制
发表时间：
2018-06-01
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
True, Jacqui
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Tickner, J. . Ann;True, Jacqui
我们审视国际关系中的女权主义，从第一次世界大战期间妇女和平实用主义的出现到一个世纪后联合国（UN）妇女、和平与安全（WPS）议程的制定。我们认为，女权主义在国际关系中的出现并不晚。相反，国际关系比女权主义来得晚。此外，我们还展示了妇女和平活动家在 1915 年海牙会议上阐述的原则如何代表了对该学科的独特贡献。这些原则反映了从妇女促进和平与包容的经验中得出的务实方法。这些原则的实用主义得到了 WPS 议程的四个支柱的呼应和进一步发展，这些支柱由妇女权利倡导者制定，通过反复试验的过程，以获得国家对推进平等和持久和平原则的支持。 1915年，各国可能拒绝将讨论妇女权利作为国际谈判的适当事项。但随着二十世纪妇女政治权利的演变，现在有可能在国际和平与安全问题上提出女权主义观点。通过恢复上个世纪国际关系女权主义中被忽视的方面，本文有助于进一步以一种另类的、实用主义的视角来看待认识和处理国际关系的方式。
We examine feminism in international relations from the emergence of women's peace pragmatism during WWI to the development of the United Nations (UN) Women, Peace, and Security (WPS) agenda a century later. We argue that feminism did not come late to international relations. Rather, international relations came late to feminism. Moreover, we show how the principles articulated by women peace activists at the 1915 Hague Conference represent distinct contributions to the discipline. These principles reflect a pragmatic approach derived from women's experiences of promoting peace and inclusion. The pragmatism of these principles is echoed by, and further developed in, four pillars of the WPS agenda-as shaped by advocates of women's rights, working through processes of trial and error, to gain state support for advance principles of equal and lasting peace. States may have rejected discussion of women's rights as an appropriate matter for international negotiations in 1915. But with the evolution of women's political rights during the twentieth century, it is now possible to advance a feminist perspective on international peace and security. By recovering neglected aspects of the last century of international relations' feminism, this article helps further an alternative, pragmatist perspective on ways of knowing and doing international relations.