[Letters to the Editor]
[Letters to the Editor]
复制标题
DOI：
10.1002/mus.880161221
复制
发表时间：
1930-10
期刊：
影响因子：
64.8
通讯作者：
Denise Howel;W. W. Campbell-W.;Lawrence R. Robinson;James S. Appelbaum;Raymond P. Roos;Satoshi Kuwabara;Masashi Nakajima;Yoshio Tsuboi;Keizo Hirayama;John J. Doyle;William S. David;P. Seror;Adília Hormigo;Maria De Lourdes Sales Luís;Manuela Alves;Alexandre De Mendocça;David C. Preston;Sharon Jubrias;Gary A. Klug;Y. Péréon;A. Elkhammari;J. Noireaud
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Denise Howel;W. W. Campbell-W.;Lawrence R. Robinson;James S. Appelbaum;Raymond P. Roos;Satoshi Kuwabara;Masashi Nakajima;Yoshio Tsuboi;Keizo Hirayama;John J. Doyle;William S. David;P. Seror;Adília Hormigo;Maria De Lourdes Sales Luís;Manuela Alves;Alexandre De Mendocça;David C. Preston;Sharon Jubrias;Gary A. Klug;Y. Péréon;A. Elkhammari;J. Noireaud
埃格顿和乌伯洛德似乎都认为，用钠线反转法测定的火焰温度可能过高。在我看来，总体而言，这一比例过高的证据似乎势不可挡，而且最近也进行了研究。与铂电阻法测定的温度相比，它们不仅通常过高（高达数百摄氏度），而且有时与理想的计算温度相比也是如此。
MESSRS. EGERTON and Ubbelohde appear to agree that flame temperatures determined by the sodium line reversal method may be too high. The evidence that they are, in general, too high, seems to me to be overwhelming and has been recently reviewed1. They are not only in general too high (by some hundreds of degrees centigrade) when compared with temperatures determined by the platinum resistance method, but sometimes also when compared with the ideal calculated temperatures.