Assertion-based Approaches to Auditing Complex Elections, with application to party-list proportional elections
Assertion-based Approaches to Auditing Complex Elections, with application to party-list proportional elections
复制标题
基于断言的复杂选举审计方法,适用于政党名单比例选举
DOI:
10.1007/978-3-030-86942-7_4
复制
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Damjan Vukcevic
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Michelle L. Blom;Jurlind Budurushi;R. Rivest;Philip B. Stark;Peter James Stuckey;Vanessa J. Teague;Damjan Vukcevic
Risk-limiting audits (RLAs), an ingredient in evidence-based elections, are increasingly common. They are a rigorous statistical means of ensuring that electoral results are correct, usually without having to perform an expensive full recount—at the cost of some controlled probability of error. A recently developed approach for conducting RLAs, SHANGRLA, provides a flexible framework that can encompass a wide variety of social choice functions and audit strategies. Its flexibility comes from reducing sufficient conditions for outcomes to be correct to canonical ‘assertions’ that have a simple mathematical form. Assertions have been developed for auditing various social choice functions including plurality, multi-winner plurality, super-majority, Hamiltonian methods, and instant runoff voting. However, there is no systematic approach to building assertions. Here, we show that assertions with linear dependence on transformations of the votes can easily be transformed to canonical form for SHANGRLA. We illustrate the approach by constructing assertions for party-list elections such as Hamiltonian free list elections and elections using the D’Hondt method, expanding the set of social choice functions to which SHANGRLA applies directly.