How metonymic are metaphors
How metonymic are metaphors
复制标题
隐喻的转喻性如何
DOI：
10.1515/9783110219197.407
复制
发表时间：
2002
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Radden Günter
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Radden Günter
转喻和隐喻被认为是一个连续体，它们之间存在模糊的情况。本文的重点是转喻隐喻的中间概念。基于转喻隐喻的产生有四个来源：(I)源域和目标域的共同经验基础，基于关联和互补关系；(Ii)会话含义，从隐含结果和因果、隐含所有、隐含目的和活动等方面进行说明；(Iii)范畴的分类结构；(Iv)文化模式，例如我们民间对身体力量、交流和语言、情感和生理反应的理解。(冈特·拉登)
Metonymy and metaphor are assumed to form a continuum with fuzzy cases between these categories. The paper focuses on the intermediate notion of metonymy-based metaphor. Four sources which may give rise to metonymy-based metaphor are distinguished: (i) a common experiential basis of source and target domain, due to the relationships of correlation and complementarity, (ii) conversational implicature, illustrated in the areas of implicated result and causation, implicated possession, and implicated purpose and activity, (iii) the taxonomic structure of categories, (iv) cultural models, exemplified by way of our folk understanding of physical force, communication and language, and emotion and physiological reaction. (Gunter Radden)