Deterrence, Legitimacy, and Wildlife Crime in Protected Areas
Deterrence, Legitimacy, and Wildlife Crime in Protected Areas
复制标题
保护区内的威慑、合法性和野生动物犯罪
DOI：
10.1002/9781119376866.ch3
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
Jacinta M. Gau
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
William D. Moreto;Jacinta M. Gau
威慑在减少保护区(PA)野生动物犯罪的努力中占有突出地位。本章概述了威慑理论，因为它适用于保护区内的野生动物犯罪。然后回顾了相关文献，威慑理论与犯罪学相关的理论基础，以及威慑方法在管理和监测公共行动机构方面的好处和局限性。本章还讨论了与自然资源管理有关的政府合法性文献的相关性和作用。合法性和规范性遵守与预防野生动物犯罪有着明确的理论相关性，尽管与其他领域相比，关于自然资源管理和保护条例执行方面遵守情况的文献有限。本章借鉴刑事逻辑和刑事司法文献，论证了规范性遵守的重要性，以及程序正义和信任对警察合法性的作用。最后，它为未来的学术研究提供了路线图。
Deterrence features prominently in efforts to reduce wildlife crime in protected areas (PAs). This chapter provides an overview of deterrence theory as it applies to wildlife crime within PAs. It then reviews the relevant literature, the theoretical underpinnings of deterrence theory as it relates to the criminology, and the benefits and limitations of deterrence‐based approaches in the management and monitoring of PAs. The chapter also discusses the relevance and role of the government‐legitimacy literature as it relates to natural resource management. Legitimacy and normative compliance have clear theoretical relevance to the prevention of wildlife crime, although the literature on compliance within natural resource management and enforcement of conservation regulations is limited compared to other fields. Drawing on the crimino‐logical and criminal justice literature, the chapter demonstrates the importance of normative compliance, as well as the role of procedural justice and trust on police legitimacy. It ends by providing a road map for future scholarship.