Insensible Worlds: Postrelational Ethics, Indeterminacy and the (k)Nots of Relating
Insensible Worlds: Postrelational Ethics, Indeterminacy and the (k)Nots of Relating
复制标题
麻木的世界：后关系伦理、不确定性和关系的（k）不点
DOI：
10.1068/d17411
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Kathryn Yusoff
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kathryn Yusoff
在生物多样性丧失的背景下，本文提出了一个问题：什么是响应？在问责任是如何作为一个明智的问题提出，我认为有必要解决不明智的，非物质的，和不合时宜的问题和关系的尺寸。我认为，沿着无知觉的尖端思考，提供了一条进入一个扩展的关系领域的途径，它质疑支配着可理解性领域的排斥，并帮助我们在自然之间思考，以促进一种非当代的理解伦理。采取让-吕克南希的概念，感觉，特别是他的想法周围的方向感，我认为，不明智的是一个领域的可能性的实践中的社会和情感规范的感觉，可能会释放其他模式的存在。这是一篇关于感觉作为物质形成、作为同居、作为与世界同居有关的排斥策略的论文。我认为，如果我们要围绕诸如生物多样性丧失、生物技术生活的新形式和气候变化等分散、不确定和错位的问题，创造新的感觉实践和新的情感，那么理解感觉是如何融入我们的思维习惯和物质性理论的，是至关重要的。我的结论是，如果无感觉的事物提醒我们注意感觉在确保进入关系、关系的结构和关系的先验取向方面的作用，那么它也指出了我们在与非人类的他人进行思维时的排斥模式和抵抗形式，这些模式和抵抗形式在关系性之前和之外。
Within the context of biodiversity loss, this paper asks the question: What is response? In asking how responsibility is raised as a sensible question, I argue there is a need to address the insensible, immaterial, and untimely dimensions of matter and relations. I suggest that thinking along the cusp of the insensible offers a way into an expanded realm of relationality that queries the exclusions that govern the sphere of intelligibility, and help us think between natures to promote a noncontemporaneous ethics of apprehension. Taking up Jean-Luc Nancy's concept of sense and specifically his ideas around the direction of sense, I argue that the insensible is a realm of possibility within the praxis of social and affective norms of sense that may release other modes of being into being. This is a paper about sense as matter forming, as cohabitation, and as an exclusionary tactic that bears on the cohabitation of worlds. I argue that an understanding of how sense is enrolled into our habits of thought and theories of materialities is crucial if we are to create new practices of sensations and new sensibilities around such diffuse, recalcitrant, and dislocated issues as biodiversity loss, new forms of biotechnological life, and climate change. I conclude that if the insensible alerts us to the work of sense in securing the bringing into relation, its configurations, and its a priori orientations, then it also points towards modes of exclusion and forms of resistance in our thinking with nonhuman others that are before and beyond relationality.