Recommended practices and ethical considerations for natural language processing-assisted observational research: A scoping review.

Recommended practices and ethical considerations for natural language processing-assisted observational research: A scoping review.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1111/cts.13463
复制
发表时间:
2023-03
期刊:
Clinical and translational science
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
--
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

越来越多的研究报告使用自然语言处理 (NLP) 从电子健康记录 (EHR) 中提取临床信息来协助观察研究。目前,NLP 辅助观察性研究尚无标准化报告指南。缺乏详细的报告指南可能会在使用 NLP 衍生内容时产生歧义、当前研究报告实践中的知识差距以及可重复性挑战。为了解决这些问题,我们对 NLP 辅助的观察性临床研究进行了范围审查,并检查了其报告实践,重点关注 NLP 方法和评估。通过调查,我们发现报告实践存在很大差异,例如测量研究参考文献的使用不一致、报告地点(参考文献、附录和手稿)的变化以及 NLP 方法和评估细节的不同粒度。为了促进 NLP 解决方案在临床研究中的广泛采用和利用,我们概述了与世界卫生组织 (WHO) 发布的指导健康人工智能的道德使用的六项原则相一致的几个观点。
An increasing number of studies have reported using natural language processing (NLP) to assist observational research by extracting clinical information from electronic health records (EHRs). Currently, no standardized reporting guidelines for NLP‐assisted observational studies exist. The absence of detailed reporting guidelines may create ambiguity in the use of NLP‐derived content, knowledge gaps in the current research reporting practices, and reproducibility challenges. To address these issues, we conducted a scoping review of NLP‐assisted observational clinical studies and examined their reporting practices, focusing on NLP methodology and evaluation. Through our investigation, we discovered a high variation regarding the reporting practices, such as inconsistent use of references for measurement studies, variation in the reporting location (reference, appendix, and manuscript), and different granularity of NLP methodology and evaluation details. To promote the wide adoption and utilization of NLP solutions in clinical research, we outline several perspectives that align with the six principles released by the World Health Organization (WHO) that guide the ethical use of artificial intelligence for health.
DOI: 10.1186/s12877-017-0645-7
发表时间: 2017-10-25
期刊: BMC geriatrics
影响因子: 4.1
作者:
Anzaldi LJ;Davison A;Boyd CM;Leff B;Kharrazi H
通讯作者: Kharrazi H
DOI: 10.2310/jim.0b013e318250871d
发表时间: 2012-06-01
影响因子: 2.6
作者:
Bennett, L. Michelle;Gadlin, Howard
通讯作者: Gadlin, Howard
DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70264-0
发表时间: 1996-03-01
影响因子: 6.2
作者:
Gilbert, EH;Lowenstein, SR;Steiner, J
通讯作者: Steiner, J
DOI: 10.1136/jamia.1994.95236146
发表时间: 1994-03-01
影响因子: 6.4
作者:
FRIEDMAN, C;ALDERSON, PO;JOHNSON, SB
通讯作者: JOHNSON, SB
DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbx197
发表时间: 2019-01-01
影响因子: 6.6
作者:
Downs J;Dean H;Lechler S;Sears N;Patel R;Shetty H;Hotopf M;Ford T;Kyriakopoulos M;Diaz-Caneja CM;Arango C;MacCabe JH;Hayes RD;Pina-Camacho L
通讯作者: Pina-Camacho L