Can corrective feedback improve recognition memory?
Can corrective feedback improve recognition memory?
复制标题
DOI：
10.3758/mc.38.4.389
复制
发表时间：
2010-06-01
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
Lindsay, D. Stephen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kantner, Justin;Lindsay, D. Stephen
纠正反馈对再认记忆的影响的理解可以为再认理论和记忆训练计划提供信息，但很少有已发表的研究调查了这个问题。虽然迄今为止的证据表明，反馈并不能提高识别的准确性，很少有研究直接研究其对敏感性的影响，更少的创造条件，促进反馈优势，鼓励控制处理测试。在实验1中，观察到反馈的零效应后，深和浅编码的分类研究清单。在实验2中，反馈强烈影响反应偏差，让参与者辨别高度不均匀的新老项目的基本利率，但敏感性不受影响。在实验3中，一个错误的记忆程序，反馈未能削弱错误识别的关键诱惑。在实验4中，参与者无法使用反馈来学习一个简单的分类规则，将旧项目与新项目分开，尽管事实上，反馈在几乎相同的分类任务中具有实质性的益处。识别系统，尽管有文件证明的能力，利用受控的战略或推理决策过程，似乎在很大程度上无法穿透的纠正反馈的好处。
An understanding of the effects of corrective feedback on recognition memory can inform both recognition theory and memory training programs, but few published studies have investigated the issue. Although the evidence to date suggests that feedback does not improve recognition accuracy, few studies have directly examined its effect on sensitivity, and fewer have created conditions that facilitate a feedback advantage by encouraging controlled processing at test. In Experiment 1, null effects of feedback were observed following both deep and shallow encoding of categorized study lists. In Experiment 2, feedback robustly influenced response bias by allowing participants to discern highly uneven base rates of old and new items, but sensitivity remained unaffected. In Experiment 3, a false-memory procedure, feedback failed to attenuate false recognition of critical lures. In Experiment 4, participants were unable to use feedback to learn a simple category rule separating old items from new items, despite the fact that feedback was of substantial benefit in a nearly identical categorization task. The recognition system, despite a documented ability to utilize controlled strategic or inferential decision-making processes, appears largely impenetrable to a benefit of corrective feedback.