Self-Control Capacity as a Predictor of Borderline Personality Disorder Features, Problematic Drinking, and Their Co-occurrence.

Self-Control Capacity as a Predictor of Borderline Personality Disorder Features, Problematic Drinking, and Their Co-occurrence.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1521/pedi_2016_30_249
复制
发表时间:
2017-06
影响因子:
2.3
通讯作者:
Wilson SJ
Wilson SJ
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Johnson BN;Ashe ML;Wilson SJ

文献摘要

相似文献

边缘型人格障碍(BPD)和酒精使用障碍(AUD)都是冲动性的病因。然而,冲动是不明确的,往往与自我控制能力重叠。本研究试图解开这些结构及其与酒精使用和BPD的关联。本科生(N = 192)完成了五因素模型评定表,它产生了两个维度的BPD量表,自我控制量表,UPPS-P(自我报告的冲动),停止信号和延迟折扣任务(实验室测量的冲动)。自我控制似乎是BPD特征和饮酒的主要预测因子,解释了与冲动性一样多或更多的结果差异。BPD升高特征和饮酒问题的共同发生也最好用自我控制来解释。冲动性的实验室测量与BPD量表或酒精使用无关。自我调节能力可能是BPD和酒精使用的一个重要但被忽视的因素,在未来的研究中应该与冲动性一起考虑。
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) and alcohol use disorder (AUD) share impulsivity as an etiological factor. However, impulsivity is ill-defined, often overlapping with self-control capacity. This study attempts to disentangle these constructs and their associations with alcohol use and BPD. Undergraduates (N = 192) completed the Five Factor Model Rating Form, which generated two dimensional scales of BPD, the Self-Control Scale, the UPPS-P (self-reported impulsivity), and the Stop-signal and delay discounting tasks (laboratory-measured impulsivity). Self-control appeared as a major predictor of BPD features and drinking, explaining as much or more variance in outcome than impulsivity. Co-occurrence of elevated BPD features and problem drinking was also best explained by self-control. Laboratory measures of impulsivity were not correlated with BPD scales or alcohol use. Self-regulatory capacity may be an important but overlooked factor in BPD and alcohol use and should be considered alongside impulsivity in future research.