Do U.S. research institutions meet or exceed federal mandates for instruction in responsible conduct of research? A national survey.

Do U.S. research institutions meet or exceed federal mandates for instruction in responsible conduct of research? A national survey.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1097/acm.0b013e318260fe5c
复制
发表时间:
2012-09
期刊:
Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Dinse GE
Dinse GE
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Resnik DB;Dinse GE

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

探索美国研究机构在多大程度上满足或超过美国国立卫生研究院和国家科学基金会的授权,以提供负责任的研究行为(RCR)的指导。2011年夏天,作者向负责监督美国和波多黎各200家顶级资助研究机构的RCR教学计划的官员发送了一封电子邮件调查。他们交叉分类的比例超过联邦授权的类型需要接受培训的额外的个人和医学院的存在/缺席。从144个机构(72%)收到了答复;所有机构都有RCR计划。在这144人中,69人(47.9%)只要求联邦政府授权的个人参加RCR培训,而75人(52.1%)还要求额外的个人接受培训。有医学院的机构(62.3%; 53/85)比没有医学院的机构(37.3%; 22/59)超出了联邦的授权。需要接受培训的其他个人类型包括选定课程的所有学生(23.6%; 34/144);所有学生参加外部资助的研究(12.5%; 18/144);所有研究生(11.1%; 16/144);所有参与外部资助研究的教职员工(9.7%; 14/144);所有博士后(8.3%; 12/144);所有博士生(4.9%; 7/144);所有参与人类受试者研究的教职员工(4.9%; 7/144);所有参与动物研究的教职员工(2.1%; 3/144)。与没有医学院的机构相比,更多的机构超过了联邦RCR的培训任务。作者鼓励其他机构扩大其RCR要求,以促进研究诚信。
To explore the extent to which U.S. research institutions are meeting or exceeding National Institutes of Health and National Science Foundation mandates to provide instruction in responsible conduct of research (RCR). In summer 2011, the authors sent an e-mail survey to officials responsible for overseeing RCR instructional programs at the 200 top-funded research institutions in the United States and Puerto Rico. They cross-classified the proportions exceeding federal mandates by the types of additional individuals required to receive training and by medical school presence/absence. Responses were received from 144 institutions (72%); all had an RCR program. Of these 144, 69 (47.9%) required only federally mandated individuals to take RCR training, while 75 (52.1%) required additional individuals to be trained as well. A greater proportion of institutions with medical schools (62.3%; 53/85) went beyond the federal mandates than did those without (37.3%; 22/59). Types of additional individuals required to receive training included all students in selected programs (23.6%; 34/144); all students participating in externally funded research (12.5%; 18/144); all graduate students (11.1%; 16/144); all faculty/staff participating in externally funded research (9.7%; 14/144); all postdoctoral students (8.3%; 12/144); all doctoral students (4.9%; 7/144); all faculty/staff involved in human subjects research (4.9%; 7/144); and all faculty/staff involved in animal research (2.1%; 3/144). More institutions with medical schools exceeded federal RCR training mandates than did those without. The authors encourage other institutions to expand their RCR requirements to promote research integrity.