Judicial policy-making and Europeanization: the proportionality of national control and administrative discretion
Judicial policy-making and Europeanization: the proportionality of national control and administrative discretion
复制标题
司法决策与欧洲化：国家控制与行政自由裁量权的相称性
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
D. Martinsen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Martinsen
司法决策对传统上由国家主权保护的政治领域产生越来越大的影响。本文探讨了欧洲司法机构如何扩大社区的福利和移民的政策领域的能力，随后的欧洲化，对成员国政府的偏好。它认为，相称性原则是欧洲法院在超国家原则与国家政策条件和行政裁量权之间取得平衡的最有力手段。虽然最高法院以前在经济法范围之外谨慎地适用这一原则，但它不再那么勉强，而是普遍限制了国家政策控制的核心，即国家行政部门在几乎所有领域详细制定、调整和管理国家政策的能力。
Judicial policy-making is having an increasing impact on political domains traditionally guarded by national sovereignty. This paper examines how the European judiciary has expanded Community competences into the policy domains of welfare and immigration, followed by subsequent Europeanization, against the preferences of the member governments. It finds that the principle of proportionality constitutes a most powerful means for the European Court to strike the balance between supranational principles and national policy conditions and administrative discretion. While the Court has previously been cautious to apply the principle beyond economic law, it no longer treads as reluctantly, instead generally limiting the inner core of national policy control, i.e. the capacity of the national executive to detail, condition and administer national policies in almost all domains.