Association of Prehospital Advanced Life Support by Physician With Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest With Blunt Trauma Following Traffic Collisions Japanese Registry-Based Study

Association of Prehospital Advanced Life Support by Physician With Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest With Blunt Trauma Following Traffic Collisions Japanese Registry-Based Study
复制标题

DOI:
10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0674
复制
发表时间:
2018-06-01
期刊:
影响因子:
16.9
通讯作者:
Kukita, Ichiro
Kukita, Ichiro
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fukuda, Tatsuma;Ohashi-Fukuda, Naoko;Kukita, Ichiro

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

重要性 对于院前环境中的重症和受伤患者,包括院外心脏骤停 (OHCA) 和重大创伤,高级生命支持 (ALS) 还是基本生命支持 (BLS) 哪个更优仍然存在争议。 目的 评估是否应为创伤性 OHCA 提供院前 ALS 以及由谁执行。 设计、设置和参与者 日本政府管理的全国范围内以人群为基础的心肺疾病患者登记数据对被送往急救医院的 OHCA 进行了分析。 2013 年至 2014 年交通事故后经历创伤性 OHCA 的患者也被纳入其中。将由医生提供院前 ALS 的患者与由紧急医疗服务 (EMS) 人员提供 ALS 的患者以及仅接受 BLS 的患者进行比较。数据于 2017 年 5 月 1 日进行分析。 暴露 由医生提供高级生命支持,由 EMS 人员提供 ALS,或仅 BLS。 主要结果和措施 主要结果是 1 个月生存率。次要结局是院前自主循环恢复和良好的神经系统结局,格拉斯哥-匹兹堡脑功能类别评分为 1 或 2。 结果 总共纳入 4382 名患者(平均 [SD] 年龄,57.5 [22.2] 岁;67.9% 为男性); 828 人 (18.9%) 接受了医生的院前 ALS,1591 人 (36.3%) 接受了 EMS 人员的院前 ALS,1963 人 (44.8%) 仅接受了 BLS。在这些患者中,96 名 (2.2%) 患者在 OHCA 后 1 个月存活,其中 828 名因医生 ALS 治疗的患者中的 26 名 (3.1%) 患者,1591 名由 EMS 人员治疗的 ALS 患者中的 25 名患者 (1.6%),以及 1963 名因 BLS 治疗的 45 名患者 (2.3%)。使用多变量逻辑回归调整潜在的混杂因素后,与 EMS 人员和 BLS 的 ALS 相比,医生的 ALS 与更高的 1 个月生存率显着相关(调整后的 OR,2.13;95% CI,1.20-3.78;调整后的 OR,1.94;95% CI,1.14-3.25),而 EMS 人员的 ALS 和 BLS 之间没有显着差异(调整后 OR,0.91;95% CI,0.54-1.51)。 ALS 队列中的倾向评分匹配分析显示,与 EMS 人员实施的 ALS 相比,医生实施的 ALS 与 1 个月生存率增加相关(风险比,2.00;95% CI,1.01-3.97;P=.04)。这种关联在各种敏感性分析中是一致的。 结论和相关性 在创伤性 OHCA 中,与 EMS 人员和 BLS 实施的 ALS 相比,医生实施的 ALS 与 1 个月生存机会增加相关。
IMPORTANCE Controversy remains as to whether advanced life support (ALS) or basic life support (BLS) is superior for critically ill and injured patients, including out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and major trauma, in the prehospital setting.OBJECTIVE To assess whether prehospital ALS should be provided for traumatic OHCA and who should perform it.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Japanese government-managed nationwide population-based registry data of patients with OHCA transported to an emergency hospital were analyzed. Patients who experienced traumatic OHCA following a traffic collision from 2013 to 2014 were included. Patients provided prehospital ALS by a physician were compared with both patients provided ALS by emergency medical service (EMS) personnel and patients with only BLS. The data were analyzed on May 1, 2017.EXPOSURES Advanced life support by physician, ALS by EMS personnel, or BLS only.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was 1-month survival. The secondary outcomes were prehospital return of spontaneous circulation and favorable neurologic outcomes with the Glasgow-Pittsburgh cerebral performance category score of 1 or 2.RESULTS A total of 4382 patients were included (mean [SD] age, 57.5 [22.2] years; 67.9% male); 828 (18.9%) received prehospital ALS by physician, 1591 (36.3%) received prehospital ALS by EMS personnel, and 1963 (44.8%) received BLS only. Among these patients, 96 (2.2%) survived 1 month after OHCA, including 26 of 828 (3.1%) for ALS by physician, 25 of 1591 (1.6%) for ALS by EMS personnel, and 45 of 1963 (2.3%) for BLS. After adjusting for potential confounders using multivariable logistic regression, ALS by physician was significantly associated with higher odds for 1-month survival compared with both ALS by EMS personnel and BLS (adjusted OR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.20-3.78; and adjusted OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.14-3.25; respectively), whereas there was no significant difference between ALS by EMS personnel and BLS (adjusted OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.54-1.51). A propensity score-matched analysis in the ALS cohort showed that ALS by physician was associated with increased chance of 1-month survival compared with ALS by EMS personnel (risk ratio, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.01-3.97; P=.04). This association was consistent across a variety of sensitivity analyses.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In traumatic OHCA, ALS by physician was associated with increased chance of 1-month survival compared with both ALS by EMS personnel and BLS.