Value of audio-enhanced handheld computers over paper surveys with adolescents.
Value of audio-enhanced handheld computers over paper surveys with adolescents.
复制标题
DOI：
10.5993/ajhb.37.1.7
复制
发表时间：
2013-01
影响因子：
2.3
通讯作者：
Borawski EA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Trapl ES;Taylor HG;Colabianchi N;Litaker D;Borawski EA
研究3种数据收集模式对回答问题数量、数据质量和学生偏好的影响。本研究以275名城市七年级学生为被试，随机分为纸笔问卷、PDA问卷和PDA有声问卷。学生们完成了一份书面汇报调查。与SAQ和PDA相比，APDA受访者完成了更多的问题。PDA和APDA的缺失数据显著少于SAQ。学生评价没有发现差异。使用APDA进行以学校为基础的青少年数据收集可能会带来很大的好处。
To examine the impact of 3 data collection modes on the number of questions answered, data quality, and student preference. 275 urban seventh-grade students were recruited and randomly assigned to complete a paper survey (SAQ), PDA survey (PDA), or PDA survey with audio (APDA). Students completed a paper debriefing survey. APDA respondents completed significantly more questions compared to SAQ and PDA. PDA and APDA had significantly less missing data than did SAQ. No differences were found for student evaluation. Strong benefits may be gained by the use of APDA for adolescent school-based data collection.