K-t GRAPPA-accelerated 4D flow MRI of liver hemodynamics: influence of different acceleration factors on qualitative and quantitative assessment of blood flow

K-t GRAPPA-accelerated 4D flow MRI of liver hemodynamics: influence of different acceleration factors on qualitative and quantitative assessment of blood flow
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/s10334-014-0456-1
复制
发表时间:
2014-08
期刊:
Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Z. Stankovic;J. Fink;J. Collins;Edouard Semaan;M. Russe;J. Carr;M. Markl;M. Langer;B. Jung
Z. Stankovic;J. Fink;J. Collins;Edouard Semaan;M. Russe;J. Carr;M. Markl;M. Langer;B. Jung
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Z. Stankovic;J. Fink;J. Collins;Edouard Semaan;M. Russe;J. Carr;M. Markl;M. Langer;B. Jung

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

材料与方法16名健康志愿者在3 T加速条件下(R = 3、R= 5、R = 8),用GRAPPA加速4D血流成像技术对16例健康志愿者肝脏血管系统进行了k-t并行成像(2.0 × 2.5 × 2.4 mm 3,TR = 82 ms),R = 5(TR = 41 ms); GRAPPAR= 2用作参考标准。定性流动分析包括三维流线和时间分辨颗粒痕迹的分级。定量评估评估了速度、净流量和壁面剪切应力(WSS)。结果与标准GRAPPAR= 2(21- 71%)相比,所有加速因子实现了显著的扫描时间节省(p< 0.001)。与标准GRAPAR = 2相比,k-tGRAPAR = 3 andR= 5之间的速度和净流量的量化提供了类似的结果。在标准GRAPPAR= 2和k-t GRAPPAR= 8之间观察到显著增加的泄漏伪影和噪声(p< 0.001),肝动脉系统中峰值速度和WSS的显著低估高达31%(p<0.05)。对于k-t GRAPPAR= 5,门静脉系统所有血管的WSS被显著低估高达13%,而在两个静脉中,对于具有较高时间分辨率的相同加速度,观察到显著较高的值结论4D Flow MRI的k-t加速技术用于肝脏血流动力学评价是可行的,加速因子R = 3和R = 5导致扫描时间减少至少40%,与GRAPPAR= 2相比,肝脏血流动力学的定量相似。
ObjectiveWe sought to evaluate the feasibility of k-t parallel imaging for accelerated 4D flow MRI in the hepatic vascular system by investigating the impact of different acceleration factors.Materials and methodsk-t GRAPPA accelerated 4D flow MRI of the liver vasculature was evaluated in 16 healthy volunteers at 3T with acceleration factorsR= 3,R= 5, andR= 8 (2.0 × 2.5 × 2.4 mm3, TR = 82 ms), andR= 5 (TR = 41 ms); GRAPPAR= 2 was used as the reference standard. Qualitative flow analysis included grading of 3D streamlines and time-resolved particle traces. Quantitative evaluation assessed velocities, net flow, and wall shear stress (WSS).ResultsSignificant scan time savings were realized for all acceleration factors compared to standard GRAPPAR= 2 (21–71 %) (p< 0.001). Quantification of velocities and net flow offered similar results between k-t GRAPPAR= 3 andR= 5 compared to standard GRAPPAR= 2. Significantly increased leakage artifacts and noise were seen between standard GRAPPAR= 2 and k-t GRAPPAR= 8 (p< 0.001) with significant underestimation of peak velocities and WSS of up to 31 % in the hepatic arterial system (p<0.05). WSS was significantly underestimated up to 13 % in all vessels of the portal venous system for k-t GRAPPAR= 5, while significantly higher values were observed for the same acceleration with higher temporal resolution in two veins (p< 0.05).Conclusionk-t acceleration of 4D flow MRI is feasible for liver hemodynamic assessment with acceleration factorsR= 3 andR= 5 resulting in a scan time reduction of at least 40 % with similar quantitation of liver hemodynamics compared with GRAPPAR= 2.