Intraprocedural Ablation Margin Assessment by Using Ammonia Perfusion PET during FDG PET/CT-guided Liver Tumor Ablation: A Pilot Study
Intraprocedural Ablation Margin Assessment by Using Ammonia Perfusion PET during FDG PET/CT-guided Liver Tumor Ablation: A Pilot Study
复制标题
DOI:
10.1148/radiol.2018172108
复制
发表时间:
2018-07-01
期刊:
影响因子:
19.7
通讯作者:
Silverman, Stuart G.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Shyn, Paul B.;Casadaban, Leigh C.;Silverman, Stuart G.
Purpose: To prospectively determine whether nitrogen 13 (N-13) ammonia perfusion positron emission tomography (PET) during fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT)-guided liver tumor ablation can be used to intraprocedurally assess ablation margins.Materials and Methods: Eight patients (five women and three men; age range, 36-74 years; mean age, 57 years) were enrolled in this pilot study and underwent FDG PET/CT-guided microwave ablation of 11 FDG-avid liver metastases (mean diameter, 22 mm; range, 11-34 mm). All procedures were performed between March 2014 and December 2016. Complete ablation margin visibility and minimum ablation margin thickness were assessed by using intraprocedural N-13-ammonia perfusion PET compared with 24-hour postprocedural MR imaging by two independent blinded radiologists. Local tumor progression for each ablated tumor was assessed at follow-up imaging for 3-38 months (median, 17.6 months). Descriptive analysis was performed.Results: Eleven of 11 (100%) ablation margins were fully assessable by using intraprocedural perfusion PET by both readers; six of eleven (55%) margins were fully assessable by both readers at postprocedural 24-hour MR imaging. By using perfusion PET, one tumor that had been judged by both readers to have a minimum margin of 0 mm progressed locally. No tumors judged to have a minimum margin greater than 0 mm at perfusion PET progressed locally.Conclusion: N-13-ammonia perfusion PET during FDG PET/CT-guided liver tumor ablations can potentially be used to intraprocedurally assess the entire ablation margin, including the minimum margin. (c) RSNA, 2018