A meta-analysis of chemokines in major depression.
A meta-analysis of chemokines in major depression.
复制标题
重度抑郁症趋化因子的荟萃分析。
DOI:
10.1016/j.pnpbp.2016.02.006
复制
发表时间:
2016-07-04
影响因子:
5.6
通讯作者:
Baune BT
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Eyre HA;Air T;Pradhan A;Johnston J;Lavretsky H;Stuart MJ;Baune BT
Chemokines are increasingly recognised as playing a role in depression. Here we meta-analyse the data on concentrations of all chemokines in patients diagnosed with a major depression versus healthy controls. We included studies which utilised Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)-IV diagnostic criteria for major depression, participants free from major medical conditions, studies with healthy controls, and unstimulated measurements of chemokines. We only included chemokines which had ≥3 studies performed. Two chemokines and 15 studies in total met criteria for this meta-analysis; 8 for Monocyte Chemotactic Protein (MCP)-1/CCL2 (n = 747), and 7 for Interleukin (IL)-8/CXCL8 (n = 560). There were significantly higher concentrations of CCL2/MCP-1 in depressed subjects compared with control subjects – overall mean difference of 36.43 pg/mL (95% CI: 2.43 to 70.42). There was significant heterogeneity across these studies (I2 = 98.5%). The estimates of mean difference between the control and depression groups did not remain significant when the trim-and-fill procedure was used to correct for publication bias. There was no significant difference in concentrations of IL-8/CXCL8 in depressed subjects compared with control subjects. Significant heterogeneity was found across these studies (I2 = 96.7%). The estimates of mean difference between the control and depression groups remained non-significant when the trim-and-fill procedure was used to correct for publication bias. This meta-analysis reports significantly heterogeneity in this field among studies. There are higher concentrations of the chemokine MCP-1/CCL2 in depressed subjects compared with control subjects, and no differences for IL-8/CXCL8. More high quality research and consistent methodologies are needed in this important area of enquiry.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
6.8
作者:
Carvalho LA;Bergink V;Sumaski L;Wijkhuijs J;Hoogendijk WJ;Birkenhager TK;Drexhage HA
通讯作者:
Drexhage HA
DOI:
10.1016/j.bbi.2015.06.001
发表时间:
2015-10
期刊:
Brain, behavior, and immunity
影响因子:
--
作者:
Haapakoski R;Mathieu J;Ebmeier KP;Alenius H;Kivimäki M
通讯作者:
Kivimäki M
影响因子:
10.6
作者:
Dowlati, Yekta;Herrmann, Nathan;Lanctot, Krista L.
通讯作者:
Lanctot, Krista L.
影响因子:
7.6
作者:
Hannestad, Jonas;DellaGioia, Nicole;Bloch, Michael
通讯作者:
Bloch, Michael
影响因子:
9.3
作者:
Hinojosa AE;Garcia-Bueno B;Leza JC;Madrigal JL
通讯作者:
Madrigal JL