Hostile and benevolent sexism - Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women
Hostile and benevolent sexism - Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00104.x
复制
发表时间：
1997-03-01
影响因子：
4
通讯作者：
Fiske, ST
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Glick, P;Fiske, ST
提出了一种性别歧视理论，即对女性的矛盾心理，而不仅仅是敌意。矛盾性别歧视理论区分敌对性别歧视和“仁慈”性别歧视（每种性别歧视都涉及权力、性别差异和性取向问题）。仁慈的性别歧视包括对传统角色中的女性的主观积极态度（对于性别歧视者来说）：保护性家长作风、女性理想化以及对亲密关系的渴望。敌对性别歧视包含各个方面的消极对应物：主导性家长作风、贬义信仰和异性恋敌意。这两种形式的性别歧视都是为了证明和维护父权制和传统性别角色。对这些结构的衡量标准——矛盾性别歧视量表（ASI）——的有效性进行了审查。提供了 ASI 和其他性别歧视态度衡量标准（例如 AWS）之间的比较，并针对不同尺度的适当领域提出了建议。
A theory of sexism as ambivalence, not just hostility, toward women is presented. Ambivalent Sexism Theory distinguishes between hostile and ''benevolent'' sexism (each addresses issues of power, gender differentiation, and sexuality). Benevolent sexism encompasses subjectively positive (for the sexist) attitudes toward women in traditional roles: protective paternalism, idealization of women, and desire for intimate relations. Hostile sexism encompasses the negative equivalents on each dimension: dominative paternalism, derogatory beliefs, and heterosexual hostility. Both forms of sexism serve to justify and maintain patriarchy and traditional gender roles. The validity of a measure of these constructs, the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI), is reviewed. Comparisons are offered between the ASI and other measures of sexist attitudes (e.g., the AWS), with suggestions for the proper domains of different scales.