Remarks on Holmberg's generalization

Remarks on Holmberg's generalization
复制标题

对霍姆伯格概括的评论

DOI:
10.1111/1467-9582.00038
复制
发表时间:
1999
期刊:
影响因子:
0.6
通讯作者:
A. Holmberg
A. Holmberg
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Holmberg

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文认为,斯堪的纳维亚宾语移位对动词移动的依赖性,即Holmberg泛化,是一种更一般条件的特例,它阻止宾语在动词、介词、动词助词或另一个论元中跨越任何语义上可见的范畴。阻挡类别的公开移动总是为对象转移铺平道路。宾语移位和动词话题化(动词移位到specCP)之间的相互作用表明:(A)动词如何移动对宾语移位没有影响,(B)Holmberg的概括是派生问题,而不是表征问题;(C)宾语移位不遵循严格的循环。本文认为,宾语移位是在文体规则的一个组成部分中插入语体特征后发生的,其包含的规则依赖于焦点结构。
It is argued that the dependence of Scandinavian Object Shift on verb movement, called Holmberg’s Generalization, is a special case of a more general condition preventing Object Shift across any phologically visible category within VP: a verb, a preposition, a verb particle or another argument. Overt movement of the blocking category will always pave the way for Object Shift. The interplay between Object Shift and Verb Topicalization (verb movement to specCP) shows (a) that it makes no difference to Object Shift how the verb moves, as long as it moves, (b) that Holmberg’s Generalization is a matter of derivation, not representation, and (c) that Object Shift does not observe the strict cycle. It is proposed that Object Shift applies after insertion of pholological features in a component of stylistic rules, containing rules dependent on focus structure.