Interactions between sustainable livelihood of rural household and agricultural land transfer in the mountainous and hilly regions of Sichuan, China

Interactions between sustainable livelihood of rural household and agricultural land transfer in the mountainous and hilly regions of Sichuan, China
复制标题

四川山区丘陵地区农户可持续生计与农地流转的相互作用

DOI:
10.1002/sd.1937
复制
发表时间:
2019-07-01
影响因子:
12.5
通讯作者:
Su, Shenglin
Su, Shenglin
中科院分区:
环境科学与生态学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Guo, Shili;Lin, Lei;Su, Shenglin

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

农户可持续生计研究对于解决农村贫困问题、促进农村土地经营权流转具有重要意义,是实现改善生计和可持续发展的必要条件。基于四川省240户农户的调查数据,采用偏最小二乘结构方程模型,系统解释了生计资本、生计策略与农地流转的互动机制。研究结果表明:(1)农户生计策略对土地流转特征有显著的负向影响。非农劳动力/生计多样性指数的比例越高,推出地块的可能性越大。非农业劳动力/生计多样性指数的比例越低,越有可能滚入地块。(b)生计战略对自然资本有直接的负向影响,土地流转对自然资本有间接的正向影响。(c)民生战略对金融资本保险有间接的正向影响。金融资本保险具有中介作用:土地流转不仅对自然资本保险产生直接的负向影响,而且通过自然资本保险对自然资本保险产生间接影响。(d)金融资本保险对金融资本收益有直接的正向影响,而土地出让金和自然资本对金融资本收益有间接的负向影响。财政资本收入在其中起中介作用,生计策略不仅对财政资本收入产生直接的正向影响,而且通过人力资本对财政资本收入产生间接的正向影响。(e)物质资本和人力资本直接受到生计战略的积极影响。(f)观察到了某些缓和效应。非农业依赖型农户比农业依赖型农户拥有更高的物质资本、更大的人力资本、更高的金融资本收益和更多的铺开地块面积。该研究为制定改善民生和可持续发展的政策提供了理论指导。
Research on the sustainable livelihoods of rural households is of great significance in solving rural poverty and promoting the transfer of rural land management rights, which are necessary for realizing better livelihoods and sustainable development. In this study, we used a partial least squares-structural equation model to systematically explain the interacting mechanisms of livelihood capital, livelihood strategy, and agricultural land transfer in the mountainous and hilly regions of Sichuan, China, based on survey data from 240 rural households. The results are as follows: (a) land transfer characteristics were negatively affected by farmers' livelihood strategies. The higher the proportion of the nonagricultural labor force/livelihood diversity index, the greater the possibility to roll-out plots. The lower the proportion of the nonagricultural labor force/livelihood diversity index, the greater the possibility to roll-in plots. (b) Natural capital was directly and negatively affected by livelihood strategy, and indirectly and positively affected by land transfer. (c) Financial capital insurance was indirectly and positively affected by livelihood strategy. Financial capital insurance had a mediating effect: land transfer not only had a direct negative effect on it but also had an indirect effect through natural capital. (d) Financial capital income was directly positively affected by financial capital insurance, and indirectly negatively affected by land transfer and natural capital. Financial capital income had a mediating effect, and livelihood strategy not only had a direct positive effect on it but also had an indirect positive effect via human capital. (e) Physical capital and human capital were directly positively affected by livelihood strategy. (f) Certain moderating effects were observed. Nonagriculture-dependent farmers had higher physical capital, greater human capital, higher financial capital income, and more area of roll-out plots than agriculture-dependent farmers. This study provides theoretical guidance for the formulation of policies for livelihood improvement and sustainable development.