Stop and search in London: counter-terrorist or counter-productive?
Stop and search in London: counter-terrorist or counter-productive?
复制标题
在伦敦拦截搜查：反恐还是适得其反？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Alpa Parmar
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Alpa Parmar
“合理怀疑”原则旨在防止警察滥用截停、搜查和逮捕的权力，并加强问责。2000年《恐怖主义法》第44条规定的拦截和搜查缺乏“合理怀疑”的要求，这引起了争议，并要求进行立法改革。有人提出的问题是，根据第44条规定的反恐警务工作是否仅仅是损害公民自由和制裁“种族貌相”的有效措施。本文通过对伦敦截查行动的观察、对警察和民众的采访，从警察和被警察的角度考察了s44的实施、经验和看法。该论文认为，恐怖主义的幽灵使不公平的警务工作合法化--无论是在概念上还是在实践中--少数族裔社区已成为可疑和潜在的情报来源。这本身就有问题，产生了一种二元期望框架，在追求人的安全方面是无形和矛盾的。少数民族社区被定为犯罪，因其宗教背景而被具体化，种族内部的紧张关系和模糊性加深。
The principle of ‘reasonable suspicion’ aims to prevent the abuse of the police power to stop, search and arrest and to increase accountability. The lack of a ‘reasonable suspicion’ requirement in stop and search under Section 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000 generated controversy and demands for legislative reform. Questions were raised about whether counter-terrorist policing efforts under s44 were effective of merely compromising civil liberties and sanctioning ‘ethnic profiling’. Drawing on observations of stop and search operations, interviews with police and people in London, this paper examines the implementation, experience and perception of s44 from the perspective of police and policed. The paper contends that the spectre of terrorism has legitimated unfair policing – both conceptually and practically – and ethnic minority communities have become suspect and potential intelligence sources. This is inherently problematic, generating a binary framework of expectations which are intangible and contradictory in pursuing human security. Ethnic minority communities have been criminalised, reified in reference to their religious backgrounds, and intra-ethnic tensions and ambiguities have deepened.
DOI：
10.1093/he/9780199590278.003.0024
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
Green P
通讯作者：
Green P