On dropouts and refusers in child psychotherapy: reply to Garfield.
On dropouts and refusers in child psychotherapy: reply to Garfield.
复制标题
关于儿童心理治疗中的辍学者和拒绝者：回复加菲猫。
DOI：
10.1037/0022-006x.57.1.170
复制
发表时间：
1989
影响因子：
5.9
通讯作者：
D. Langmeyer
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Weisz;B. Weiss;D. Langmeyer
我们同意加菲猫的观点，即在各研究中保持辍学组标准的一致性是有价值的。因为我们的方法服务于这个目标，所以我们对他的这部分批评感到困惑。在我们的研究中使用的术语“辍学”，可以合理地用加菲猫的术语“拒绝者”来代替;然而，我们儿童诊所的程序现实使这两个术语都很合适。在加菲猫的建议下，我们提供了关于那些他认为是真正辍学的年轻人的新数据;分析表明，如果我们使用这个群体，我们以前报告的结果会是一样的。
We agree with Garfield that there is value in keeping criteria for dropout groups consistent across studies. Because our methods served this goal, we are puzzled at this part of his critique. The term dropout, as used in our study, might reasonably be replaced with Garfield's term refuser; however, the procedural realities of our child clinics make both terms appropriate. At Garfield's suggestion, we present new data on those youngsters he considers true dropouts; analyses reveal that the results we previously reported would have been the same had we used this group.