Comparative study iinto the robustness of compartmental modeling and model-free analysis in DCE-MRI studies
Comparative study iinto the robustness of compartmental modeling and model-free analysis in DCE-MRI studies
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/jmri.20529
复制
发表时间:
2006-04-01
影响因子:
4.4
通讯作者:
Parker, GJM
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Roberts, C;Issa, B;Parker, GJM
Purpose: To evaluate and compare the reproducibility of the preferred phenomenological parameter IAUC(60) (initial area under the time-concentration curve [IAUC] defined over the first 60 seconds postenhancement) with the preferred modeling parameter as derived using two simple models, in abdominal and cerebral data collected in typical Phase I clinical trial conditions.Materials and Methods: Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) time series were acquired at two imaging centers from a group of patients with abdominal tumors and a group with gliomas. At both imaging centers, precontrast T-1 was calculated using a variable flip angle three-dimensional spoiled gradient echo acquisition that was used to quantify tissue contrast agent concentration. allowing voxelwise definition of summary DCE-MRI parameters.Results: A comparison of reproducibility showed that there was no statistically significant difference in reproducibility between IAUC(60) and K-trans, although there was a trend towards better reproducibility for W,an, (p = 0.0782). The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for individual changes showed that for IAUC(60) and K-trans, changes in excess of 47% and 31%, respectively. are outside the range of normal variability.Conclusion: Although modeling is more complex and more computationally intensive than an IAUC parameterization, our data suggest this approach to be preferable to a model-free approach since it provides greater physiological insight without a reduction in statistical power for Phase I/II clinical drug trials.