Comparative study iinto the robustness of compartmental modeling and model-free analysis in DCE-MRI studies

Comparative study iinto the robustness of compartmental modeling and model-free analysis in DCE-MRI studies
复制标题

DOI:
10.1002/jmri.20529
复制
发表时间:
2006-04-01
影响因子:
4.4
通讯作者:
Parker, GJM
Parker, GJM
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Roberts, C;Issa, B;Parker, GJM

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:评价和比较首选现象学参数IAUC(60)的重现性在典型的I期临床试验条件下收集的腹部和大脑数据中,使用如使用两个简单模型导出的优选建模参数(在增强后的前60秒内定义的时间-浓度曲线下的初始面积[IAUC])来计算。动态对比增强MRI(DCE-MRI)时间序列采集在两个成像中心从一组患者腹部肿瘤和一组胶质瘤。在两个成像中心,使用可变翻转角三维扰相梯度回波采集计算对比前T-1,用于量化组织造影剂浓度。结果:再现性的比较显示,在IAUC(60)和K-transs之间的再现性没有统计学显著差异,尽管对于W,an,(p = 0.0782)有朝向更好再现性的趋势。个体变化的95%置信区间(CI)显示,IAUC(60)和K-transs的变化分别超过47%和31%。结论:虽然建模比IAUC参数化更复杂,计算更密集,但我们的数据表明这种方法优于无模型方法,因为它提供了更大的生理洞察力,而不会降低I/II期临床药物试验的统计能力。
Purpose: To evaluate and compare the reproducibility of the preferred phenomenological parameter IAUC(60) (initial area under the time-concentration curve [IAUC] defined over the first 60 seconds postenhancement) with the preferred modeling parameter as derived using two simple models, in abdominal and cerebral data collected in typical Phase I clinical trial conditions.Materials and Methods: Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) time series were acquired at two imaging centers from a group of patients with abdominal tumors and a group with gliomas. At both imaging centers, precontrast T-1 was calculated using a variable flip angle three-dimensional spoiled gradient echo acquisition that was used to quantify tissue contrast agent concentration. allowing voxelwise definition of summary DCE-MRI parameters.Results: A comparison of reproducibility showed that there was no statistically significant difference in reproducibility between IAUC(60) and K-trans, although there was a trend towards better reproducibility for W,an, (p = 0.0782). The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for individual changes showed that for IAUC(60) and K-trans, changes in excess of 47% and 31%, respectively. are outside the range of normal variability.Conclusion: Although modeling is more complex and more computationally intensive than an IAUC parameterization, our data suggest this approach to be preferable to a model-free approach since it provides greater physiological insight without a reduction in statistical power for Phase I/II clinical drug trials.