Open government: connecting vision and voice
Open government: connecting vision and voice
复制标题
开放政府：连接愿景和声音
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Hillebrandt
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Meijer;D. Curtin;M. Hillebrandt
开放政府一词通常用于描述将政府信息放在互联网上的举措。这种概念化过于受限，因为开放政府不仅涉及信息方面（愿景）的开放，而且还涉及互动方面（声音）的开放。本文在对 103 篇文章进行分析的基础上，深入探讨了开放、透明和参与的概念、它们之间的相互作用以及它们在文献中的讨论方式。该分析显示了开放政府的经济、政治学和法律观点之间的差异和相似之处，并认为需要采取多学科方法。作者的结论是，开放政府太重要了，不能把它留给“技术人员”：具有法律、经济学、政治学和公共管理背景的科学家和从业者也应该参与进来，在愿景和声音之间建立良好的联系，以促进积极的公民意识。给实践者的要点 本文为实现开放政府提供了指导方针：(1) 设计开放政府以实现透明度和参与之间的协同或互补关系，(2) 设计开放政府以实现多元化人口，(3) 设计开放政府以实现直接和间接影响，(4) 设计开放政府承认各种期望，(5) 设计开放政府以持续了解影响和副作用。作者强调，从长远来看，开放政府设计的多元化方法将比仅仅从公开信息的角度理解它更加富有成效。
The term open government is often used to describe initiatives of putting government information on the Internet. This conceptualization is too restricted since open government is not only about openness in informational terms (vision) but also about openness in interactive terms (voice). On the basis of an analysis of 103 articles, this article provides insight into the concepts of openness, transparency and participation, their interactions, and the manner in which they have been discussed in the literature. This analysis shows the differences and similarities between economic, political science and legal perspectives on open government and argues that a multidisciplinary approach needs to be taken. The authors conclude that open government is much too important to leave it to the ‘techies’: scientists and practitioners with backgrounds in law, economics, political science and public administration should also get involved to build sound connections between vision and voice that facilitate active citizenship. Points for practitioners This article provides guidelines for the realization of open government: (1) design open government for synergistic or complementary relationships between transparency and participation, (2) design open government for a diverse population, (3) design open government for direct and indirect effects, (4) design open government acknowledging a variety in desirables and (5) design for continuous learning about effects and side-effects. The authors emphasize that a diversified approach to the design of open government will be more fruitful in the long run than merely understanding it in terms of making information publicly available.