SMALL-SIDED GAMES VERSUS INTERVAL TRAINING IN AMATEUR SOCCER PLAYERS: EFFECTS ON THE AEROBIC CAPACITY AND THE ABILITY TO PERFORM INTERMITTENT EXERCISES WITH CHANGES OF DIRECTION
SMALL-SIDED GAMES VERSUS INTERVAL TRAINING IN AMATEUR SOCCER PLAYERS: EFFECTS ON THE AEROBIC CAPACITY AND THE ABILITY TO PERFORM INTERMITTENT EXERCISES WITH CHANGES OF DIRECTION
复制标题
DOI：
10.1519/jsc.0b013e31824294c4
复制
发表时间：
2012-10-01
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
Pialoux, Vincent
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Dellal, Alexandre;Varliette, Christophe;Pialoux, Vincent
Dellal， A, Varliette， C, Owen， A, Chirico， EN和Pialoux， V.业余足球运动员的小边比赛与间歇训练：对有氧能力的影响和进行间歇运动的能力与方向的变化。本研究的目的是比较小边比赛（ssg）与高强度间歇训练（HIT）对持续有氧测试（Vameval）和间歇方向变化测试（CODs； 30-15间歇体能测试[30-15(IFT)]）的影响。将22名业余足球运动员（平均年龄+/- SD: 26.3 +/- 4.7岁）分为3个不同的组，分别为SSG组（n = 8）、HIT组（n = 8）和对照组（CG; n = 6），为期6周。除了通常的技术战术训练和竞技游戏，SSG组进行了9次2对2和1对1的SSG训练，而HIT组进行了9次间歇跑，形式是30秒的努力穿插30秒的被动恢复（30秒-30秒）、15秒-15秒和10秒-10秒。HIT组和SSG组在Vameval测试（分别为5.1和6.6%）和30-15（IFT）间歇CODs测试（分别为5.1和5.8%）中表现出性能改善，而CG的性能没有变化。在为期6周的训练期间，HIT组和SSG组运动员在30-15（IFT）和Vameval测试中的表现都有相似的提高，特别是与传统训练相比有显著差异（p < 0.05）。本研究表明，SSG和HIT干预在发展男性业余足球运动员有氧能力和间歇性运动能力方面同样有效。此外，在6周的训练中，这两种训练方法对恢复能力和重复180度方向变化的能力产生了相似的效果。教练现在可以根据训练目标在这两种方法中进行选择，并优化训练。
Dellal, A, Varliette, C, Owen, A, Chirico, EN, and Pialoux, V. Small-sided games versus interval training in amateur soccer players: Effects on the aerobic capacity and the ability to perform intermittent exercises with changes of direction. J Strength Cond Res 26(10): 2712-2720, 2012-The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of small-sided games (SSGs) in soccer versus high-intensity intermittent training (HIT) on a continuous aerobic test (Vameval) and the performance in an intermittent test with changes of direction (CODs; 30-15 intermittent fitness test [30-15(IFT)]). Twenty-two amateur soccer players (mean age +/- SD: 26.3 +/- 4.7 years) were assigned to 3 different groups for 6 weeks: SSG group (n = 8), HIT group (n = 8), and control group (CG; n = 6). In addition to the usual technical and tactical sessions and competitive games, the SSG group performed 9 sessions of 2 versus 2 and 1 versus 1 SSGs, whereas the HIT group performed 9 sessions of intermittent runs in the form of 30 seconds of effort interspersed with 30 seconds of passive recovery (30s-30s), 15s-15s, and 10s-10s. The HIT and SSG groups showed performance improvements in the Vameval test (5.1 and 6.6%, respectively) and the 30-15(IFT) intermittent test with CODs (5.1 and 5.8%, respectively), whereas there was no change in the performance of the CG. Players from HIT and SSG groups showed similar increase in their performance in the 30-15(IFT) and the Vameval tests during the 6-week training period, especially with an increase significantly different to that in a traditional training as in the CG (p < 0.05). This investigation demonstrates that both SSG and HIT interventions are equally effective in developing the aerobic capacity and the ability to perform intermittent exercises with CODs in male amateur soccer players. Furthermore, these 2 methods of training applied during the 6 weeks induce similar effect on the recovery capacity and on the ability to repeat directional changes of 180 degrees. Coaches will now be able to choose between these two methods according to the objective of the training and to optimize the training.