Traditional and Contemporary Mindfulness: Finding the Middle Path in the Tangle of Concerns

Traditional and Contemporary Mindfulness: Finding the Middle Path in the Tangle of Concerns
复制标题

传统与当代正念:在纠结中寻找中间道路

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2015
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
J. Compson
J. Compson
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
L. Monteiro;R. F. Musten;J. Compson

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

当代正念已经通过无数的世俗和临床项目发展起来。这种快速增长引起了佛教界的两个主要关注:教义的准确性和没有明确将道德作为教义的一部分的影响。具体的问题包括一个潜在的削弱正念的概念,并作为一个必然的结果,误解的意图正念作为一种技术症状缓解。关于教义中缺乏明确的道德规范,有人表示担心,这种遗漏有可能滥用正念练习,使其弊大于利。本文探讨了传统正念社区表达的主要批评,并评估了这些批评的有效性。传统和当代正念实践者之间的对话是一个机会,可以检查基于正念的干预措施(MBIs)的概念完整性,包括正确的正念,评估MBIs是否包括可以将其扩展到症状缓解之外的因素,并反思与MBI计划的一部分教学伦理相关的问题。由于伦理学在传统正念中被视为冥想练习的基础,因此详细探讨了它对MBIs的潜在贡献。
Contemporary mindfulness has grown through innumerable secular and clinical programs. This rapid growth has raised two main concerns from the Buddhist community: the accuracy of the teachings and the impact of not explicitly including ethics as part of the teachings. Specific concerns include a potential weakening of the concept of right mindfulness and, as a corollary, misunderstanding the intent mindfulness as being a technique for symptomatic relief. With respect to the absence of explicit ethics in the teachings, concerns are expressed that this omission risks misappropriating mindfulness practices so that they do more harm than good. This article explores the main criticisms expressed by Traditional Mindfulness community and assesses the validity of these criticisms. The dialogue between traditional and contemporary mindfulness practitioners is an opportunity to examine the conceptual integrity of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) with respect to what comprises right mindfulness, assess whether MBIs include the factors that can extend them beyond symptomatic relief, and reflect on the issues related to teaching ethics as part of an MBI program. Because ethics is viewed in Traditional Mindfulness as a foundation for a meditative practice, it is explored in detail for its potential contribution to MBIs.
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.1384
发表时间: 2009-09-23
影响因子: 120.7
作者:
Krasner, Michael S.;Epstein, Ronald M.;Quill, Timothy E.
通讯作者: Quill, Timothy E.