Capturing Diversity: A Typology of Third Sector Organisations’ Responses to Contracting Based on Empirical Evidence from Homelessness Services

Capturing Diversity: A Typology of Third Sector Organisations’ Responses to Contracting Based on Empirical Evidence from Homelessness Services
复制标题

捕捉多样性:基于无家可归者服务经验证据的第三部门组织对承包的反应类型

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2012
影响因子:
2
通讯作者:
Heather Buckingham
Heather Buckingham
中科院分区:
法学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Heather Buckingham

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

摘要政府承包对第三部门组织(TSO)的影响引起了广泛的讨论,然而,构成第三部门的组织的多样性意味着这些影响实际上在TSO之间有很大差异。为了更好地理解这种复杂性,更有效地分析和阐述技术支持组织的经验,考虑不同的应对类型是有益的。无家可归的TSOs在英格兰东南部地方当局的研究的实证证据的基础上,本文提出了一种类型的组织响应承包。这四种类型是:舒适的承包商,顺从的承包商,谨慎的承包商和社区为基础的非承包商。不同的经验,这些不同类型的组织方面的合同中所描述的文件,并指出需要更大的精度和区分学术辩论,并在制定有关第三部门的社会政策。
Abstract The impacts of government contracting on third sector organisations (TSOs) have attracted much discussion; however, the diversity of the organisations that comprise the third sector means that these impacts in fact vary considerably between TSOs. In order to better understand this complexity and to analyse and articulate TSOs’ experiences more effectively, it is useful to think about different response types. Based on empirical evidence from a study of homelessness TSOs in two South East England local authorities, this paper presents a typology of organisational responses to contracting. The four types identified are: Comfortable Contractors, Compliant Contractors, Cautious Contractors, and Community-Based Non-Contractors. The varied experiences of these different types of organisation with regard to contracting are described in the paper and point to the need for greater precision and differentiation within academic debates, and in the formulation of social policy relating to the third sector.