Molecular Systems Biology Peer Review Process File Dynamics of Protein Noise Can Distinguish between Alternate Sources of Gene-expression Variability Transaction Report

Molecular Systems Biology Peer Review Process File Dynamics of Protein Noise Can Distinguish between Alternate Sources of Gene-expression Variability Transaction Report
复制标题

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
--
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Abhyudai Singh;B. Razooky;R. D. Dar;L. Weinberger
Abhyudai Singh;B. Razooky;R. D. Dar;L. Weinberger
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Abhyudai Singh;B. Razooky;R. D. Dar;L. Weinberger

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

(Note:除了更正可能导致歧义的印刷或拼写错误外,信件和报告不会进行编辑。信件和裁判报告的原始格式可能不会反映在本汇编中。再次感谢您将您的工作提交给分子系统生物学。我们现在已经收到了同意评估你的手稿的三位审稿人中的两位的回复,并决定现在做出决定,以避免进一步的拖延。正如您将从下面的报告中看到的那样,裁判通常认为这项工作中提出的方法可能很有趣。然而,两人都独立地指出,在适合发表在《分子系统生物学》之前,还需要进行额外的实验工作来严格验证这种方法区分转录和翻译噪音的能力。每位评审员都对可能有助于解决他们担忧的其他实验提出了具体建议。如果你觉得你能令人满意地处理审稿人列出的要点,你可能希望提交一份修改后的手稿。请附上一封信,详细说明你是如何处理推荐人提出的每一点的。修改后的手稿将再次接受审查,你可能明白,我们不能给你保证在这个阶段,最终的结果将是有利的。在准备修改作品时,可以提供图3的原始强度数据,作为“图源数据”。请参阅我们的说明作者的更多细节准备和格式的数字源数据
(Note: With the exception of the correction of typographical or spelling errors that could be a source of ambiguity, letters and reports are not edited. The original formatting of letters and referee reports may not be reflected in this compilation.) Thank you again for submitting your work to Molecular Systems Biology. We have now heard back from two of the three referees who agreed to evaluate your manuscript, and have decided to render a decision now to avoid further delay. As you will see from the reports below, the referees generally found the method proposed in this work potentially interesting. Both independently indicated, though, that additional experimental work would be needed to rigorously validate the ability of this method to distinguish transcription and translational noise, before it would be appropriate for publication in Molecular Systems Biology. Each reviewer makes specific recommendations for additional experiments that could potentially help address their concerns. If you feel you can satisfactorily deal with the points listed by the referees, you may wish to submit a revised version of your manuscript. Please attach a covering letter giving details of the way in which you have handled each of the points raised by the referees. A revised manuscript will be once again subject to review and you probably understand that we can give you no guarantee at this stage that the eventual outcome will be favorable. When preparing your revised work, the raw intensity data for Fig. 3, requested by Reviewer #1, can be provided as "figure source data". Please see our Instructions of Authors for more details on preparation and formatting of figure source data