Evaluation of reference modeling for building performance assessment
Evaluation of reference modeling for building performance assessment
复制标题
建筑性能评估参考模型的评估
DOI：
10.1016/j.autcon.2013.12.007
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. Stouffs
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
I. Dino;R. Stouffs
生命周期建筑性能评估(LBPA)实践越来越多地应用于现有建筑，以确保在建筑使用寿命期间满足性能要求。LBPA是一个多学科和信息密集的过程，需要用于信息管理和决策支持的计算工具。我们之前已经开发了一个计算参考模型(CLIP-Core)，支持各种基于组件的LBPA实践。当考虑使用Clip-Core时，它需要适应它所处理的特定上下文。我们为两个现有的LBPA实践开发了两个这样的域模型，CLIP EPI-CREM和CLIP-CMU。本文讨论了CLIP-Core的评估及其在支持各种需求方面的潜力。在此，我们首先讨论Clip-Core和两个领域模型。然后，我们给出了基于领域模型的评估结果及其开发过程。最后，我们讨论了扩展Clip-Core的指导原则，并推荐了可以提高Clip-Core可用性的技术和替代架构。
Lifecycle building performance assessment (LBPA) practices are being increasingly applied on existing buildings to ensure that performance requirements are fulfilled during building service-life. LBPA is a multi-disciplinary and information-intense process that requires computational tools for information management and decision support. We have previously developed a computational reference model (CLIP-Core) that supports various component-based LBPA practices. When CLIP-Core is considered to be used, it needs to be adapted to the specific context it addresses. We developed two such domain models, CLIP EPI-CREM and CLIP-CMU, for two existing LBPA practices. This paper addresses the evaluation of CLIP-Core and its potential in supporting various requirements. Hereto, we first discuss CLIP-Core and the two domain models. Then we present the evaluation results based on the domain models and their development processes. Finally we discuss guidelines for extending CLIP-Core and recommend technologies and alternative architectures that can increase CLIP-Core's usability.