Forced-choice response format in the study of facial expression
Forced-choice response format in the study of facial expression
复制标题
面部表情研究中的强制选择反应格式
DOI：
10.1007/bf00995206
复制
发表时间：
1993
影响因子：
4.8
通讯作者：
J. Russell
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Russell
这篇文章是一个潜在的问题的方法论说明与强迫选择反应规模在面部表情的情绪研究。例如，在松本和埃克曼（1988）的分类中，大多数被试在使用一种强迫选择格式时将“愤怒”的面部表情报告为蔑视，在使用另一种格式时报告为厌恶，在使用第三种格式时报告为沮丧。当看到愤怒的表情，并在愤怒、沮丧和其他标签中做出选择时，很少有受试者（平均12.5%）选择危险。如果蔑视、蔑视和沮丧被认为是错误的答案，那么强迫选择就能在错误的答案上达成共识;如果愤怒是正确的答案，那么强迫选择就不能在正确的答案上达成共识。
This article is a methodological note on a potential problem with a forced-choice response scale in the study of facial expressions of emotion. For example, a majority of subjects categorized Matsumoto and Ekman's (1988) reported facial expression of “anger” as contempt when using one forced-choice format, as disgust, with another format, and as frustration, with a third. When shown the anger expression and given a choice amonganger, frustration, and other labels, few subjects (12.5% on average) selectedanger. Ifcontempt, digust, andfrustration are considered wrong answers, then forced choice can yield consensus on the wrong answer; ifanger is the right answer, then forced choice can fail to yield consensus on the right answer.