Virtual care in the pediatric emergency department: a new way of doing business?

Virtual care in the pediatric emergency department: a new way of doing business?
复制标题

小儿急诊科的虚拟护理:一种新的业务方式?

DOI:
10.1007/s43678-020-00048-w
复制
发表时间:
2021-01
期刊:
CJEM
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Tse S
Tse S
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Reid S;Bhatt M;Zemek R;Tse S

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

了解加拿大首个虚拟儿科急诊室(V-PED)的可行性、使用率和满意度。我们于2020年5月至7月在一家三级儿科医院进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,研究了虚拟护理作为现场急诊辅助的可行性和影响。来自安大略省和魁北克省寻求V-PED治疗的儿童(< 18岁)被纳入研究。在医院的电子病历中使用了一个安全、加密的视频平台。护理人员自行决定V-PED的适当性,使用标准化的在线分诊问卷来要求他们的预约。V-PED直接从患者的图表中启动,家属通过超链接加入门户网站。结果测量包括V-PED就诊次数、住院率和护理人员满意度,采用10项自愿访问后在线调查。共有1036例V-PED就诊,其中176例(17.0%)被转介进行进一步的面对面ED评估,8例(0.8%)需要住院。在107份完成的患者体验调查(10%的回应)中,大多数受访者(69%)表示,如果没有V-PED,他们“很可能”或“肯定”会亲自到急诊室就诊。87%的受访者认为整体满意度为优秀(9分或10分)。我们的新型V-PED是可行的,具有较高的照顾者满意度,并可以减少亲自就诊的负担。未来的工作必须确保急诊虚拟护理的安全性,并研究如何提高能力并将V-PED整合到传统急诊医学中。本文的在线版本(10.1007/s43678-020-00048-w)包含补充内容,仅供授权用户使用。
To understand the feasibility, utilization rate, and satisfaction of the first Virtual Pediatric ED (V-PED) in Canada. We conducted a prospective cohort study examining the feasibility and impact of virtual care as an adjunct to in-person emergency care at a tertiary pediatric hospital from May to July 2020. Children (< 18 years) from Ontario and Quebec seeking V-PED care were included. A secure, encrypted, video platform within the hospital’s electronic medical record was used. Caregivers self-determined appropriateness of V-PED using a standardized online triage questionnaire to request their appointment. The V-PED is directly launched from the patient’s chart and the family joins the portal via hyperlink. Outcome measures included the number of V-PED visits, hospital admission rates, and caregiver satisfaction using a 10-item voluntary post-visit online survey. A total of 1036 V-PED visits were seen of which 176 (17.0%) were referred for further in-person ED assessment, and 8 (0.8%) required hospital admission. Of the 107 completing patient experience surveys (10% response), most respondents (69%) endorsed they “very likely” or “definitely” would have presented in-person to the ED if V-PED were unavailable. Overall satisfaction was rated as excellent (9 or 10 out of 10) in 87% of respondents. Our novel V-PED is feasible, has high caregiver satisfaction, and can reduce the burden of in-person ED visits. Future work must ensure the safety of emergency virtual care and examine how to increase capacity and integrate V-PED within traditional emergency medicine. The online version of this article (10.1007/s43678-020-00048-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128927
发表时间: 2015
期刊: PloS one
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Farion KJ;Wright M;Zemek R;Neto G;Karwowska A;Tse S;Reid S;Jabbour M;Poirier S;Moreau KA;Barrowman N
通讯作者: Barrowman N
DOI: 10.1097/pec.0000000000002119
发表时间: 2020-05-01
影响因子: 1.4
作者:
Cotton, James;Bullard-Berent, Jeffrey;Sapien, Robert
通讯作者: Sapien, Robert
DOI: 10.1097/pec.0000000000002044
发表时间: 2020-02-01
影响因子: 1.4
作者:
Kim, Ji Won;Friedman, Jonathan;Platt, Shari
通讯作者: Platt, Shari
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.181426
发表时间: 2019-06-10
影响因子: 14.6
作者:
Quynh Doan;Wong, Hubert;Guttmann, Astrid
通讯作者: Guttmann, Astrid
DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6923e1
发表时间: 2020-06-12
影响因子: 33.9
作者:
Hartnett, Kathleen P.;Kite-Powell, Aaron;Gundlapalli, Adi, V
通讯作者: Gundlapalli, Adi, V