Community Engagement in the CTSA Program: Stakeholder Responses from a National Delphi Process
Community Engagement in the CTSA Program: Stakeholder Responses from a National Delphi Process
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/cts.12158
复制
发表时间：
2014-06-01
影响因子：
3.9
通讯作者：
Martinez, Linda Sprague
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Freeman, Elmer;Seifer, Sarena D.;Martinez, Linda Sprague
为了响应医学研究所（IOM）委员会2012年12月对临床和转化科学奖（CTSA）项目的利益相关者的公开请求，两个非营利组织，社区健康教育研究和服务中心（CCHERS）和社区-校园健康合作伙伴关系（CCPH），使用德尔菲法向CTSA利益相关者征求反馈。学术界和社区利益相关者被邀请参加德尔菲，这是一种用于建立群体共识的探索性方法。国际移民组织委员会就社区参与问题向特邀小组提出的六个问题以电子方式发送给利益攸关方。在第一轮中，对涉众的回应进行主题编码，然后进行统计。第二轮要求利益相关者使用李克特量表陈述他们对每个主题的同意程度。最后，在第三轮中，小组被要求根据对CTSA计划的潜在影响和实施可行性对第二轮进行排名。社区参与临床和转化研究的好处以及将社区参与整合到CTSA项目的所有组成部分的必要性是共同的主题。受访者对加强CTSA社区参与的可行性表示怀疑。
In response to the Institute of Medicine (IOM) Committee's December 2012 public request for stakeholder input on the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program, two nonprofit organizations, the Center for Community Health Education Research and Service, Inc. (CCHERS) and Community-Campus Partnerships for Health (CCPH), solicited feedback from CTSA stakeholders using the Delphi method. Academic and community stakeholders were invited to participate in the Delphi, which is an exploratory method used for group consensus building. Six questions posed by the IOM Committee to an invited panel on community engagement were electronically sent to stakeholders. In Round 1 stakeholder responses were coded thematically and then tallied. Round 2 asked stakeholders to state their level of agreement with each of the themes using a Likert scale. Finally, in Round 3 the group was asked to rank the Round 2 based on potential impact for the CTSA program and implementation feasibility. The benefits of community engagement in clinical and translational research as well as the need to integrate community engagement across all components of the CTSA program were common themes. Respondents expressed skepticism as to the feasibility of strengthening CTSA community engagement.