COGNITIVE CONTROL OF EATING BEHAVIOR AND THE DISINHIBITION EFFECT

COGNITIVE CONTROL OF EATING BEHAVIOR AND THE DISINHIBITION EFFECT
复制标题

DOI:
10.1006/appe.1994.1032
复制
发表时间:
1994-08-01
期刊:
影响因子:
5.4
通讯作者:
PUDEL, V
PUDEL, V
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
WESTENHOEFER, J;BROECKMANN, P;PUDEL, V

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

据报道,进食受限的人在高热量预负荷后会吃得过多,这种现象被称为去抑制效应。然而,当通过三因素饮食问卷(TFEQ; Stunkard & Messick,1985)或荷兰饮食行为问卷(货车Strien等人,1986年)。本研究调查了133名正常体重的年轻女性的去抑制效应,使用两个因素的分类,包括TFEQ-抑制和TFEQ-去抑制量表。受试者被要求在200 ml奶昔预负荷或无预负荷后的味觉测试期间随意食用冰淇淋。结果表明,行为去抑制效应只发生在两个分量表得分都很高的被试中。此外,高抑制分数的受试者比低抑制分数的受试者消耗更多的冰淇淋,无论他们的克制程度如何。虽然受试者与更严格的控制饮食行为并没有表现出差异的量的冰淇淋消耗或不预加载,受试者与更灵活的控制饮食行为减少了他们的摄入量后的预加载条件。关于修订的限制量表(RRS赫尔曼和Polivy,1980年),多元回归结果表明,高RRS分数可能是由于较高的TFEQ-限制或较高的TFEQ-去抑制分数。对结果的解释支持将TFEQ-去抑制量表重命名为“对饮食问题的敏感性”,因为该量表的高分表明在各种情况下暴饮暴食,而不需要事先抑制,即饮食限制。据推测,饮食问题的高敏感性可能是由严格控制饮食行为引起的,而灵活控制饮食行为可能是长期控制体重的一个问题较少的策略。
Restrained eaters have been reported to overeat following a high caloric preload, a phenomenon refered to as the disinhibition effect. However this effect has not been found when subjects were classified by the restraint subscales of the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ; Stunkard & Messick, 1985) or the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (van Strien et al., 1986). The present study investigates the disinhibition effect in 133 normal-weight young women, using a two-factorial classification including the TFEQ-restraint and the TFEQ-disinhibition scale. The subjects were requested to consume ice-cream ad libitum during a taste test following a 200-ml milkshake preload or without preload. The results show that the behavioural disinhibition effect occurs only in subjects with simultanous high scores on both subscales. In addition, subjects with high disinhibition scores consumed more ice-cream than low disinhibition subjects irrespective of their degree of restraint. While subjects with a more rigid control of eating behaviour did not show a difference in the amount of ice-cream consumed with or without preload, subjects with a more flexible control of eating behaviour reduced their intake following the preload condition. With regard to the Revised Restraint Scale (RRS Herman & Polivy, 1980) multiple regression results show that high RRS scores may be due to either higher TFEQ-restraint or higher TFEQ-disinhibition scores. The interpretation of the results favours the renaming of the TFEQ-disinhibition scale to ''susceptibility to eating problems'' because high scores on this scale indicate overeating in a variety of situations without requiring prior inhibition i.e. dietary restraint. It is supposed that high susceptibility to eating problems may be caused by rigid control of eating behaviour, whereas flexible control of eating behaviour may be a less problematic strategy of long-term weight control.