Haploidentical transplant with posttransplant cyclophosphamide vs matched unrelated donor transplant for acute myeloid leukemia

Haploidentical transplant with posttransplant cyclophosphamide vs matched unrelated donor transplant for acute myeloid leukemia
复制标题

DOI:
10.1182/blood-2015-04-639831
复制
发表时间:
2015-08-20
期刊:
影响因子:
20.3
通讯作者:
Eapen, Mary
Eapen, Mary
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ciurea, Stefan O.;Zhang, Mei-Jie;Eapen, Mary

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

我们在单倍同变(n = 192)和8/8 HLA无关的供体(n = 1982)移植后研究了急性髓样白血病(AML)的成年人。单倍性接受者接受了钙调神经蛋白抑制剂(CNI),霉酚酸盐和移植后环磷酰胺的治疗,用于移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)的预防; 104例患者接受了骨髓性,88例接受了强度调节方案。匹配的无关供体移植受者接受了霉酚酸盐或甲氨蝶呤的GVHD预防的CNI; 1245例患者患有骨髓性,737例接受了强度调节方案。与匹配的无关供体移植相比,单倍症后第30天的中性粒细胞恢复较低(90%vs 97%,p = .02)。降低强度调节移植后的相应速率为93%和96%(p = .25)。在骨髓性的环境中,与匹配相比,单倍型相比,在骨髓均3个月急性2-4级(16%vs 33%,p <.0001)和3年慢性GVHD(30%vs 53%,p <.0001)较低无关的供体移植。在降低强度调节移植后观察到类似的差异,19%对28%(P = .05)和34%vs 52%(p = .002)。在接受脊全治疗方案的患者中,在单倍耐发现和匹配的无关供体移植(p5.38)之后,总生存期的3年概率为45%(95%CI,36-54)和50%(95%CI,47-53)。降低强度调节移植后的相应速率为46%(95%CI,35-56)和44%(95%CI,0.40-47)(p = .71)。尽管有限的统计Poweris有限,但这些数据表明,用移植后环磷酰胺进行单倍体移植后AML患者的存活率与匹配的无关供体移植相当。
We studied adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after haploidentical (n = 192) and 8/8 HLA-matched unrelated donor (n = 1982) transplantation. Haploidentical recipients received calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), mycophenolate, and posttransplant cyclophosphamide for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis; 104 patients received myeloablative and 88 received reduced intensity conditioning regimens. Matched unrelated donor transplant recipients received CNI with mycophenolate or methotrexate for GVHD prophylaxis; 1245 patients received myeloablative and 737 received reduced intensity conditioning regimens. In the myeloablative setting, day 30 neutrophil recovery was lower after haploidentical compared with matched unrelated donor transplants (90% vs 97%, P = .02). Corresponding rates after reduced intensity conditioning transplants were 93% and 96% (P = .25). In the myeloablative setting, 3-month acute grade 2-4 (16% vs 33%, P < .0001) and 3-year chronic GVHD (30% vs 53%, P < .0001) were lower after haploidentical compared with matched unrelated donor transplants. Similar differences were observed after reduced intensity conditioning transplants, 19% vs 28% (P = .05) and 34% vs 52% (P = .002). Among patients receiving myeloablative regimens, 3-year probabilities of overall survival were 45% (95% CI, 36-54) and 50% (95% CI, 47-53) after haploidentical and matched unrelated donor transplants (P5.38). Corresponding rates after reduced intensity conditioning transplants were 46%(95% CI, 35-56) and 44% (95% CI, 0.40-47) (P = .71). Although statistical poweris limited, these data suggests that survival for patients with AML after haploidentical transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide is comparable with matched unrelated donor transplantation.