the Sideshows of Capitalism : The Autonomy of Migration Today

the Sideshows of Capitalism : The Autonomy of Migration Today
复制标题

资本主义的余兴:当今移民的自治

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
--
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Karakayali
Karakayali
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Serhat;Karakayali

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

卡拉卡亚勒图恢复资本主义的副业:今天的移民自主这篇文章是对我们2007年对过境移民研究项目“移民自主:走向方法论的十篇论文”的贡献的反思。1在该项目中,我们分析了欧盟边缘的移民运动和针对他们部署的移民政策,以解读新兴移民政治的新制度的轮廓。我们感兴趣的是从社会理论的角度调查移民运动的症状。我们感兴趣的是追踪边界的跨越,领土的穿越,文化的融合,制度的动荡(首先是民族国家,但也包括公民身份),语言的连接,以及对剥削和压迫的逃离-换句话说,我们感兴趣的是调查移民对当代社会形式的条件有何启示,以及超越它们的东西。在这篇文章中,我们拿起线索,并提供一些进一步的思考。十年前,我们为我们为处理移徙问题的政治工作建立新基础的努力起了一个名字:移徙自主权。令人眼花缭乱的术语、口号和纲领,它的使用,首先,对许多人来说,是一种解放行为。它不仅要求允许移民自己谈论他们的斗争,(或更一般地说,移徙者发现了自己的语言),也不是简单地试图中断无助地求助于通过种族主义压迫的受害者历史;它当然不是要在工人运动消亡后,在那些取代工人运动的社会运动中增加另一个分散的社会运动--相反,其想法是促进在与移徙有关的社会斗争中建立新的联系,以便汇集不同层次的主体(男子和妇女、工人和雇员、公民和非法移民),形成一个基础,以解放的方式加速这些斗争。最后,这为分析和实际联系移民背景下的各种斗争,超越国家界限,理解欧洲联盟边缘和内部边界的变化,以及允许这些变化成为冲突的地点提供了可能性。我们认为,移民的自主性是一个研究政治和解放政治陷阱的项目,这种政治过于纯粹地关注全球或国家层面。We hoped that migration,understood from this perspective,could provide a research framework that could consider both the local and global,while also revealing the separation and effl ux jo ur na l # 17 - 2010年10月20日,我们希望从这个角度理解的移民可以提供一个既考虑到当地又考虑到全球的研究框架,同时也揭示了分离和分离
Karakayalı Recuperating the Sideshows of Capitalism: The Autonomy of Migration Today This text is a reflection on our 2007 contribution to the TRANSIT MIGRATION research project, “The Autonomy of Migration: Ten Theses Towards a Methodology.”1 Within the project, we analyzed the movements of migration and the migration policies deployed against them at the edges of the EU, in order to decipher the contours of a new regime of emerging migration politics. We were interested in investigating, from the perspective of social theory, what was symptomatic in movements of migration. We were interested in tracing the crossing of borders, the traversing of territories, the enmeshing of cultures, the unsettling of institutions (first among them nation-states, but also citizenship), the connecting of languages, and the flight from exploitation and oppression – interested, in other words, in investigating what migration teaches us about the conditions of contemporary forms of sociality, and that which goes beyond them. With this article, we pick up the thread and offer some further thoughts. đđđđđđđđđđTen years ago, we gave a name to our efforts to create a new basis for political work dealing with migration: the autonomy of migration. Dazzling term, slogan, and program all at once, its use, first and foremost, functioned for many as an act of liberation. It not only demanded that migrants themselves be allowed to speak of their struggles (or, more generally, that migration discover its own language) nor did it simply seek to interrupt the helpless recourse to the history of victimhood that oppresses through racism; and it certainly was not about adding another decentralized social movement to those that replaced the workers’ movement after its demise – on the contrary, the idea was to contribute to the construction of new connections within the social struggles concerned with migration, in order to gather the different layers of subjectivity (as men and women, as workers and employees, as citizens and the illegalized) to form a foundation with which to accelerate these struggles in emancipatory ways. Ultimately, this opens the possibility for analytically and practically connecting various struggles within the context of migration, beyond national limits; for understanding the transformation of borders both on the edges of the European Union and within it; for allowing these transformations to become the locations of conflict. đđđđđđđđđđWe considered the autonomy of migration to be a program of research into both the political and the pitfalls of an emancipatory politics that was too purely focused on either the global or national levels. We hoped that migration, understood from this perspective, could offer a research framework that could take into consideration both the local and the global, while also revealing the separations and efl ux jo ur na l # 17 — ju ne -a ug us t 20 10 đ M an ue la B oj ad ži je v an d S er ha t K ar ak ay al ı