Enacting boundaries or building bridges? Language and engagement in food-energy-water systems science
Enacting boundaries or building bridges? Language and engagement in food-energy-water systems science
复制标题
制定边界还是搭建桥梁？
DOI：
10.1007/s42532-022-00110-0
复制
发表时间：
2022
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Redd, Elizabeth A.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gagnon, Valoree S.;Schelly, Chelsea;Lytle, William;Kliskey, Andrew;Dale, Virginia H.;Marshall, Anna-Maria;Rodriguez, Luis F.;Williams, Paula;Price, Michael Waasegiizhig;Redd, Elizabeth A.
对粮食-能源-水系统（FEWS）关系问题的科学研究需要解决多方面的“邪恶”问题。FEWS涉及在复杂和重叠的空间和时间尺度上直接和间接发生的相互作用;它们对生活在其中的人类和非人类生物也充满了不同的，有时是相互冲突的意义。在本文中，我们认为语言的边界工作的动态中的作用，认识到，语言经常使用的利益相关者和社区参与旨在解决FEWS科学和决策构建边界和限制多样性和包容性的参与。相比之下，一些语言系统提供了建立沟通桥梁的机会，而不是在接触中建立界限。根据我们参与FEWS科学以及土著知识和语言的经验，我们考虑了语言在反映世界观，价值观，实践和FEWS科学和参与互动中的作用的例子。我们特别关注Anishinaabe的土著知识和Anishinaabemowin的语言，通过具体的例子对比边界和桥梁的语言。这些例子是用来解开这项工作的论点，这是科学研究，旨在从事FEWS问题在工作景观需要与嵌入式，实际的理解。这一观点表明，必须努力解决语言在建立界限或桥梁方面的作用，同时认识到，参与培训可能不会批判性地反映语言在限制参与努力的多样性和包容性方面的作用。对语言的这种反射性考虑不加检查，可能会在不知不觉中使边界永久化，而不是建立桥梁，从而限制了旨在解决工作环境中恶劣问题的参与的有效性。
Scientific study of issues at the nexus of food–energy–water systems (FEWS) requires grappling with multifaceted, “wicked” problems. FEWS involve interactions occurring directly and indirectly across complex and overlapping spatial and temporal scales; they are also imbued with diverse and sometimes conflicting meanings for the human and more-than-human beings that live within them. In this paper, we consider the role of language in the dynamics of boundary work, recognizing that the language often used in stakeholder and community engagement intended to address FEWS science and decision-making constructs boundaries and limits diverse and inclusive participation. In contrast, some language systems provide opportunities to build bridges rather than boundaries in engagement. Based on our experiences with engagement in FEWS science and with Indigenous knowledges and languages, we consider examples of the role of language in reflecting worldviews, values, practices, and interactions in FEWS science and engagement. We particularly focus on Indigenous knowledges from Anishinaabe and the language of Anishinaabemowin, contrasting languages of boundaries and bridges through concrete examples. These examples are used to unpack the argument of this work, which is that scientific research aiming to engage FEWS issues in working landscapes requires grappling with embedded, practical understandings. This perspective demonstrates the importance of grappling with the role of language in creating boundaries or bridges, while recognizing that training in engagement may not critically reflect on the role of language in limiting diversity and inclusivity in engagement efforts. Leaving this reflexive consideration of language unexamined may unknowingly perpetuate boundaries rather than building bridges, thus limiting the effectiveness of engagement that is intended to address wicked problems in working landscapes.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
5.2
作者：
Dale, Virginia H.;Kline, Keith L.;Eichler, Sarah E.
通讯作者：
Eichler, Sarah E.
6. Ezhi-gikendamang Aanikanootamang Anishinaabemowin：Anishinaabe 翻译研究
DOI：
10.36019/9781978803374-007
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
At Translation's Edge
影响因子：
--
作者：
Margaret A. Noodin
通讯作者：
Margaret A. Noodin
Gwaabaw：将 Anishinaabe 收获协议应用于能源治理
DOI：
10.1111/cag.12615
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
Canadian Geographer
影响因子：
--
作者：
Sākihitowin Awāsis
通讯作者：
Sākihitowin Awāsis
不可持续环境中的可持续发展教育的叙述
DOI：
10.14321/j.ctt1trkk1t
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
Socio-Ecological Practice Research
影响因子：
--
作者：
J. Haladay;Scott Hicks
通讯作者：
Scott Hicks
学习动画语法1
影响因子：
0.6
作者：
R. W. Kimmerer
通讯作者：
R. W. Kimmerer