Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection Burden and Epidemiologic Risk Factors in Countries With Universal Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection Burden and Epidemiologic Risk Factors in Countries With Universal Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.20736
复制
发表时间:
2021-08-02
影响因子:
13.8
通讯作者:
Schiff SJ
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ssentongo P;Hehnly C;Birungi P;Roach MA;Spady J;Fronterre C;Wang M;Murray-Kolb LE;Al-Shaar L;Chinchilli VM;Broach JR;Ericson JE;Schiff SJ
What are the pooled prevalence of congenital cytomegalovirus infection and factors associated with the rates in high-income and low- and middle-income countries? In this systematic review and meta-analysis including 77 studies from 36 countries comprising 515 646 infants younger than 3 weeks, the pooled overall prevalence of congenital cytomegalovirus was 0.67%. The infection burden was 3-fold greater in low- and middle-income countries than in high-income countries. Lower rates were reported in screening methods using blood compared with urine or saliva. The findings of this study suggest that low- and middle-income countries incur the greatest infection burden of congenital cytomegalovirus; a global effort to address congenital cytomegalovirus in regions with the greatest prevalence is needed to reduce disease incidence and morbidity. Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection is the most common congenital infection and the leading acquired cause of developmental disabilities and sensorineural deafness, yet a reliable assessment of the infection burden is lacking. To estimate the birth prevalence of cCMV in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and high-income countries (HICs), characterize the rate by screening methods, and delineate associated risk factors of the infection. MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases were searched from January 1, 1960, to March 1, 2021, and a total of 1322 studies were identified. Studies that provided data on the prevalence of cCMV derived from universal screening of infants younger than 3 weeks were included. Targeted screening studies were excluded. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guideline was followed. Extraction was performed independently by 3 reviewers. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. Random-effects meta-analysis was undertaken. Metaregression was conducted to evaluate the association of sociodemographic characteristics, maternal seroprevalence, population-level HIV prevalence, and screening methods with the prevalence of cCMV. Birth prevalence of cCMV ascertained through universal screening of infants younger than 3 weeks for CMV from urine, saliva, or blood samples. Seventy-seven studies comprising 515 646 infants met the inclusion criteria from countries representative of each World Bank income level. The estimated pooled overall prevalence of cCMV was 0.67% (95% CI, 0.54%-0.83%). The pooled birth prevalence of cCMV was 3-fold greater in LMICs (1.42%; 95% CI, 0.97%-2.08%; n = 23 studies) than in HICs (0.48%; 95% CI, 0.40%-0.59%, n = 54 studies). Screening methods with blood samples demonstrated lower rates of cCMV than urine or saliva samples (odds ratio [OR], 0.38; 95% CI, 0.23-0.66). Higher maternal CMV seroprevalence (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.11-1.28), higher population-level HIV prevalence (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.05-1.40), lower socioeconomic status (OR, 3.03; 95% CI, 2.05-4.47), and younger mean maternal age (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.92, older age was associated with lower rates) were associated with higher rates of cCMV. In this meta-analysis, LMICs appeared to incur the most significant infection burden. Lower rates of cCMV were reported by studies using only blood or serum as a screening method. This systematic review and meta-analysis examines the prevalence of congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) in young infants by economic status of countries as well as factors contributing to the diagnosis and prevalence.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
26.1
作者:
Dollard SC;Dreon M;Hernandez-Alvarado N;Amin MM;Wong P;Lanzieri TM;Osterholm EA;Sidebottom A;Rosendahl S;McCann MT;Schleiss MR
通讯作者:
Schleiss MR
影响因子:
120.7
作者:
Boppana, Suresh B.;Ross, Shannon A.;Fowler, Karen B.
通讯作者:
Fowler, Karen B.
影响因子:
5.1
作者:
Adler, SP;Finney, JW;Best, AM
通讯作者:
Best, AM
影响因子:
1.9
作者:
Duval, S;Tweedie, R
通讯作者:
Tweedie, R
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Cannon, Michael J.;Stowell, Jennifer D.;Dollard, Sheila C.
通讯作者:
Dollard, Sheila C.