Magnetic Materials for Current Transformers
Magnetic Materials for Current Transformers
复制标题
电流互感器用磁性材料
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2013
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
P. Ruffieux
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
S. Aguilera;P. Odier;P. Ruffieux
At CERN, the circulating beam current measurement is provided by two types of transformers, the Direct Current Current Transformers (DCCT) and the Fast Beam Current Transformers (FBCT). Each type of transformer requires different magnetic characteristics regarding parameters such as permeability, coercivity and shape of the magnetization curve. Each transformer is built based on toroidal cores of a magnetic material which gives these characteristics. For example, DCCTs consist of three cores, two for the measurement of the DC component and one for the AC component. In order to study the effect of changes in these parameters on the current transformers, several interesting raw materials based on their as-cast properties were selected with the annealing process used to tune their properties for the individual needs of each transformer. First annealing tests show that the magnetization curve, and therefore the permeability, of the material can be modified, opening the possibility for building and studying a variety of transformer cores. CURRENT TRANSFORMERS AT CERN At CERN’s accelerator complex, current transformers have been used to measure the beam’s current since the 1960’s. Nowadays, there are a total of 96 transformers out of which, 22 are DCCTs and 74 are FBCTs. There also exist 6 spares for DCCTs and 22 spares for FBCTs. Currently, the oldest installed FBCT dates back to 1970 and the DCCT to 1982. There are also different sized transformers in order to adapt to the different vacuum chamber dimensions. MAGNETIC MATERIAL FOR TRANSFORMER CORES DCCTs consist of three magnetic cores, one for the AC component of the signal and two for the DC, while FBCTs consist normally of only one magnetic core. These cores are made out of wound ribbon of soft magnetic material. The choice of material and its magnetic characteristics for current transformers affects the parameters of the transformer such as the resolution in the case for the DCCT. The magnetic material in the transformers used at CERN was specified for making the instrument as sensitive as possible. For this, soft ferromagnetic material with a maximum relative complex permeability of more than 50 000 has been used. Other characteristics sought included low Barkhausen Noise, coercive field of around 1 A/m and low magnetostriction [1]. Typically, soft magnetic materials include permalloys (alloys with 80 % nickel and 20 % iron), amorphous alloys composed of about 80 % transition metals (mainly iron and/or cobalt) and 20 % metalloids (boron, silicon and carbon) and nanocrystalline alloys, with nanometer sized grains in an amorphous matrix [2]. The motivation for developing and manufacturing magnetic cores at CERN is driven by the interest of being able to make different sized cores in-house, to acquire the know-how for tuning the cores’ magnetic properties and the influence of the magnetic material’s parameters in the transformer response in order to improve the instrument’s performance and resolution. Influence of Material in Transformer Response The thickness of ribbons is known to affect the response of the transformer, as Eddy currents increase with it. For example, cores with different lamination thicknesses can be combined in a single transformer, making the rise time and initial decay in the first microseconds dependent on the core with the thinner lamination, and the time constant dependent on the mass of the core [3]. The power loss of the material is proportional to the area of the hysteresis loop. It is interesting to study the change in the losses with increasing magnetization frequency, produced by the damping from Eddy currents [2]. Losses are an important factor to take into consideration, as the magnetic core will heat up during operation. The maximum service temperature of the material (the limit temperature at which the material still has all of its characteristic properties) should be higher than the operational temperature the material will reach when the transformer is in use. In order to limit the temperature increase and the power loss dissipated in the material, insulation between layers is usually employed. Insulation in cores can be done in several ways. The most common are producing tape wound cores with an insulator like Dupont Kapton® or using a ceramic to insulate the layers. The latter process can be done by means of the Sol-Gel method by immersing the ribbon into a solution that becomes ceramic after a thermal treatment [4]. Proceedings of IBIC2013, Oxford, UK MOPF24 Beam Charge Monitors and General Diagnostics ISBN 978-3-95450-127-4 263 C op yr ig ht c ○ 20 13 by JA C oW — cc C re at iv e C om m on sA tt ri bu tio n 3. 0 (C C -B Y3. 0) Shaping the Magnetization Curve For the different types of transformers, the requirements of the magnetization (B-H) curve are different. DCCTs require a round-shaped curve with a coercive field of about 3 A/m, whilst the FBCTs require more of a flat-shaped and low coercivity curve. In order to change the shape of the magnetization curve, it is necessary to thermally treat the alloy (process defined as annealing). Depending on the desired final properties, the annealing must be conducted under a magnetic field in order to achieve the flatter B-H curves required by the FBCTs. It also should be taken into consideration that the adequate temperature to modify these properties should be above the Curie temperature and below the crystallization temperature to maintain its crystalline structure. Barkhausen Effect The Barkhausen Effect is a physical phenomenon which is manifested as a series of jumps in magnetization of ferromagnetic material when exposed to a varying magnetic field. Surrounding the sample by a secondary coil, the induced voltage can be transformed into acoustic noise, from which the term Barkhausen Noise (BN) derives [5]. This effect is often used as a non-destructive test to check changes in microstructure (grain boundaries, dislocations, inhomogeneities, etc.) and stress configurations of materials. It is because of this, that this technique offers a good overview of changes in magnetic domains. It is clear that the BN influences the transformer performance and its resolution [6], therefore it is an interesting characteristic to study to see the effect of the thermal treatment on the BN and then on the instrument’s response. Summary of Materials Used For this study, the materials used were iron-based amorphous and nanocrystalline alloys and cobalt-based amorphous alloys. The iron-based alloys were purchased from Qinhuangdao Yanqin Nano Science & Technology Co., Ltd (http://www.yanqin.com), and the Cobalt-based were purchased in Nanostructured & Amorphous Materials (Nanoamor), Inc. (http://www.nanoamor.com), Vacuumschmelze GmbH & Co. KG (http://www.vacuumschmelze.de) as VC 6025 G40 and Hitachi Metals Europe GmbH (http://www.metglas.com) as 2705M. As can be seen from Table 1, iron-based alloys have a higher Curie temperature than cobalt-based alloys. Table 1: Materials Summary Type Curie temperature [ C] Crystallization temperature [ C] Iron-based Amorphous 420 560 Iron-based Nanocrystalline 560 510