Racial/Ethnic Differences in Mortality in Late Midlife: Have They Narrowed in Recent Years?

Racial/Ethnic Differences in Mortality in Late Midlife: Have They Narrowed in Recent Years?
复制标题

DOI:
10.1093/geronb/gbaa175
复制
发表时间:
2021-09-01
影响因子:
6.2
通讯作者:
Tarraf,Wassim
Tarraf,Wassim
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Doza,Adit;Jensen,Gail A.;Tarraf,Wassim

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

ObjectivesTo examine hazardous/ethnic differences in mortality rates have changed in recent years among adults in late midlife,and how.MethodsWe analyze Health and Retirement Study data on non-Hispanic Whites(Whites),non-Hispanic Blacks(Blacks),and English- and Spanish speaking Hispanics(西班牙裔-英语和西班牙裔-西班牙语),年龄50-64岁,来自2个阶段:1998-2004年(阶段1,n= 8,920)和2004-2010年(阶段2,n= 7,224)。使用调查广义线性回归技术,我们将期末死亡建模为种族/民族的函数,并顺序调整一系列特定时期的基线风险因素,包括人口统计学、健康状况、健康保险、健康行为和社交网络。回归分解技术被用来评估这些因素的贡献,观察到的种族/民族差异的死亡率rates.ResultsThe死亡的比值比(ORD)是没有统计学差异的黑人(与白人)在第1期,但在第2期高出33%(OR = 1.33; 95%置信区间[CI] = 1.05-1.69)。在这两个时期,西班牙裔英语(与白人)之间的调整后的ORD没有统计学差异。在第1阶段,西班牙裔-西班牙人(与白人相比)的校正ORD较低(ORD = 0.36; 95% CI = 0.22-0.59),但在第2阶段无法区分。在第1阶段,黑人死亡率差异的50.1%由基线健康状况解释,53.1%由经济因素解释。在第2阶段,55.8%的死亡率的差异是由健康状况,40.0%的财务因素,和16.2%的健康保险status.DiscussionMortality率之间的黑人和西班牙裔西班牙人自20世纪90年代中期上升。西班牙裔西班牙人可能正在失去他们长期以来被称为“西班牙裔Paradise”的优势较低的死亡率风险。
ObjectivesTo examine whether racial/ethnic differences in mortality rates have changed in recent years among adults in late midlife, and if so, how.MethodsWe analyze Health and Retirement Study data on non-Hispanic Whites (Whites), non-Hispanic Blacks (Blacks), and English- and Spanish-speaking Hispanics (Hispanic-English and Hispanic-Spanish), aged 50–64 from 2 periods: 1998–2004 (Period 1,n= 8,920) and 2004–2010 (Period 2,n= 7,224). Using survey-generalized linear regression techniques, we model death-by-end-of-period as a function of race/ethnicity and sequentially adjust for a series of period-specific baseline risk factors including demographics, health status, health insurance, health behaviors, and social networks. Regression decomposition techniques are used to assess the contribution of these factors to observed racial/ethnic differences in mortality rates.ResultsThe odds ratio for death (ORD) was not statistically different for Blacks (vs. Whites) in Period 1 but was 33% higher in Period 2 (OR = 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05–1.69). The adjusted ORD among Hispanic-English (vs. Whites) was not statistically different in both periods. The adjusted ORD among Hispanic-Spanish (vs. Whites) was lower (ORD = 0.36; 95% CI = 0.22–0.59) in Period 1 but indistinguishable in Period 2. In Period 1, 50.1% of the disparity in mortality rates among Blacks was explained by baseline health status, 53.1% was explained by financial factors. In Period 2, 55.8% of the disparity in mortality rates was explained by health status, 40.0% by financial factors, and 16.2% by health insurance status.DiscussionMortality rates among Blacks and Hispanic-Spanish have risen since the mid-1990s. Hispanic-Spanish may be losing their advantageous lower risk of mortality, long known as the “Hispanic Paradox.”