Social determinants of health: the need for data science methods and capacity.
Social determinants of health: the need for data science methods and capacity.
复制标题
健康的社会决定因素:对数据科学方法和能力的需求。
DOI:
10.1016/s2589-7500(24)00022-0
复制
发表时间:
2024
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Hogan,Joseph
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Chunara,Rumi;Gjonaj,Jessica;Immaculate,Eileen;Wanga,Iris;Alaro,James;Scott-Sheldon,LoriAJ;Mangeni,Judith;Mwangi,Ann;Vedanthan,Rajesh;Hogan,Joseph
Social determinants of health (SDoH) include forces, systems, and conditions that shape the environments in which people are born, grow, work, live, and age. Racism and climate change, for example, affect quality of life and other health outcomes through structural factors, including economic policies, social norms, and other factors that shape environments and consequently the behaviours of people. Indeed, mitigating health inequities requires attention to their root causes and adjacent factors. SDoH can have a greater effect on quality of life and other health outcomes than healthcare spendings or lifestyle choices alone. 1, 2 Accordingly, we need to inform analytical models (eg, those used to assess the effect of exposures or interventions on health outcomes) to account for, analyse, and implement interventions on SDoH, such as greenspace improvements. 3 In this Comment, we highlight three challenges to measuring and analysing SDoH for which data science—a cross-disciplinary set of skills to make judgements and decisions with data by using it responsibly and effectively—can be harnessed. The three challenges listed are briefly introduced and elaborated on, including clear examples of data science approaches to address: data necessary for capturing the exposure of interest at multiple levels appropriately are not always available nor easy to measure; SDoH are distal to individual health outcomes compared to biomedical determinants such as comorbidities; and the distal placement of SDoH in relation to health outcomes results in requires long periods of time to observe their effect (in some cases over decades or generations). The complex interplay of SDoH at individual, community, societal, and policy levels, and how these determinants operate to affect health outcomes is shown in the figure. The first challenge is that data necessary for capturing the exposure of interest at multiple levels (eg, social, policy, etc) appropriately are not always available or easy to measure. For example, frameworks of health have been enhanced to include forms of discrimination (eg, racism), 4 but these phenomena are difficult to quantify. Previous work makes use of observable but imperfect proxies of discrimination, such as social position (eg, refering to an individual’s or a group’s place or status by using race, instead of the acting force of racism) or variables (eg, population segregation) that might not be at scales relevant to the lived experience of all individuals. 5 Data science methods can be used to create measures of discrimination from unstructured data without a specified format (eg, clinic notes) and other concepts not easily captured or readily available in existing databases. For example, natural language processing and machine learning along with precise geolocation of social media data have been used to ascertain discriminatory climate—one aspect of structural discrimination, embodied by a particular place. 6 Creating such measures assures improved understanding of the effects of multiple forms of discrimination on health by complementing existing data types, such as perceived discrimination from surveys, segregation from census