Interruptions as multimodal outputs: which are the less disruptive?
Interruptions as multimodal outputs: which are the less disruptive?
复制标题
作为多模式输出的中断：哪些干扰较小？
DOI：
10.1109/icmi.2002.1167043
复制
发表时间：
2002
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Stouffs
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ernesto Arroyo;T. Selker;A. Stouffs
本文介绍了中断模式和破坏性的探索性研究。五种中断方式进行了比较：热，气味，声音，振动，和光。比模式之间的差异更值得注意的是人与人之间的差异。我们发现，受试者的敏感性取决于他们以前的生活接触的方式。个体差异在很大程度上控制了中断刺激的效果。我们表明，有可能建立一个多模态自适应中断接口，这样的接口将动态选择输出中断模态使用的基础上，其有效性对特定的用户。
This paper describes exploratory studies of interruption modalities and disruptiveness. Five interruption modalities were compared: heat, smell, sound, vibration, and light. Much more notable than the differences between modalities was the differences between people. We found that subjects' sensitiveness depended on their previous life exposure to the modalities. Individual differences greatly control the effect of interrupting stimuli. We show that is possible to build a multimodal adaptive interruption interface, such interfaces would dynamically select the output interruption modality to use based on its effectiveness on a particular user.