Teton investigation — A review of existing findings
Teton investigation — A review of existing findings
复制标题
提顿调查——对现有调查结果的回顾
DOI：
10.1016/0013-7952(87)90063-9
复制
发表时间：
1987
影响因子：
7.4
通讯作者：
A. Penman
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Penman
在撰写本报告之前，作者尚未参观过大坝工地。其所依据的有关提顿的信息包含在独立小组和内部审查小组的报告以及作为参考的其他出版物中。所表达的观点仅代表作者的观点，尽管它们可能反映了英国土木工程师的一些观点。水库排水清除了右桥台附近约 2,500,000 m 3 的填料。随后对故障的调查导致左桥台附近约 675,000 m 3 的土体被拆除，在峡谷中部留下了 93 m 高的金字塔状填土。有人可能会说，如果调查所需的费用可用于建设，那么可能足以支付目前认为在该地点建造安全大坝所需的额外地基处理费用。问题出现了：基金会处理不当是预算有限的结果吗？
Prior to the writing of this report, the author had not visited the dam site. The information about Teton on which it is based is contained in the reports by the Independent Panel and Interior Review Group and other publications given as references. The opinions expressed are those of the author, although they may reflect some of the points of view of British civil engineers. Discharge of the reservoir removed about 2,500,000 m 3 of fill adjacent to the right abutment. Subsequent investigation of the failure has caused the removal of about 675,000 m 3 adjacent to the left abutment, leaving a pyramid of fill, 93 m high in the middle of the canyon. It might be argued that had the expenditure required for the investigation been available for construction, it might have been sufficient to pay for the extra foundation treatment now recognised as necessary for a safe dam on that site. The question arises: was the inadequate foundation treatment the consequence of a limited budget?