Cue familiarity but not target retrievability enhances feeling-of-knowing judgments.

Cue familiarity but not target retrievability enhances feeling-of-knowing judgments.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.1074
复制
发表时间:
1992-09
期刊:
Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Bennett L. Schwartz;Janet Metcalfe
Bennett L. Schwartz;Janet Metcalfe
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bennett L. Schwartz;Janet Metcalfe

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

两个假设有关的人的能力,预测以后的记忆表现的未回忆起的项目进行了调查。目标可提取性假说认为感知判断是基于部分目标信息的;线索熟悉性假说认为感知判断是基于对线索的再认识。在实验1和2中,受试者生成或读取配对联想的目标。一半的线索已经在愉快评级任务中启动。代操作增加了回忆,但对FKJ没有影响。提示启动对回忆没有影响,但增加了FKJ。在实验3中,使用一般信息的问题,启动后,首次回忆尝试,线索和目标启动增加FKJ。实验4弥补了实验3中的困难,没有发现目标启动的效果,而线索启动增加了FKJs。结果支持线索熟悉性假说。
Two hypotheses concerning people's ability to predict later memory performance for unrecalled items were investigated. The target retrievability hypothesis states that feeling-of-knowing judgments (FKJs) are based on partial target information; and the cue familiarity hypothesis asserts that they are based on recognition of the cues. In Experiments 1 and 2, subjects either generated or read the targets of paired associates. Half of the cues had been primed in a pleasantness-rating task. The generation manipulation increased recall but had no effect on FKJs. Cue priming had no effect on recall but increased FKJs. In Experiment 3, using general information questions, primed after the initial recall attempt, both cue and target priming increased FKJs. Experiment 4, which remedied difficulties in Experiment 3, showed no effect of target priming whereas cue priming increased FKJs. The results favor the cue familiarity hypothesis.