Insecure attachment may not hamper relationships: a dyadic fit perspective
Insecure attachment may not hamper relationships: a dyadic fit perspective
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s12144-022-04005-x
复制
发表时间：
2022-11
影响因子：
2.8
通讯作者：
Kexin Wang;Fugui Li;Jie Xu;Shuang Chen;Mingjie Zhou
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kexin Wang;Fugui Li;Jie Xu;Shuang Chen;Mingjie Zhou
对浪漫关系的研究，除其他细节外，重点关注二元伴侣之间依恋的匹配效应，因为匹配视角可以揭示伴侣之间的相互依赖和相互作用。然而，依恋匹配与关系质量的关系却产生了不一致的结果。本研究调查了 434 对约会情侣和 929 对已婚夫妇的二元依恋匹配与关系质量之间的联系。我们发现，与焦虑的差异相比，焦虑的一致性并不总是与更高质量的关系相关。值得注意的是，焦虑一致性与关系质量之间的关联似乎用 U 曲线表示，这表明拥有两个高度焦虑的伴侣的二人组可以培养令人满意的关系。此外，回避差异较大的二人组比差异较小的二人组具有更高的关系质量。讨论的重点是二元调节效应，特别是对伴侣不安全的二元的缓冲和繁荣效应。
Research on romantic relationships has, among other details, focused on matching effect of attachment between dyadic partners, as matching perspective could reveal the interdependence and interplay between partners. However, how attachment matching relates to relationship quality has yielded inconsistent findings. The present study investigated the links between dyadic attachment matching and relationship quality among 434 dating couples and 929 married couples. We found that, in contrast with discrepancy in anxiety, congruence in anxiety does not always relate to a higher quality of relationship. Notably, the association between congruence in anxiety and relationship quality seems to be represented by a U curve, indicating that dyads with two highly anxious partners could cultivate a satisfying relationship. Furthermore, dyads with a larger discrepancy in avoidance were associated with higher relationship quality than dyads with a smaller discrepancy. The discussion focused on the dyadic regulation effect, especially the buffering and thriving effect for dyads with insecure partners.