Type D personality: A five-factor model perspective
Type D personality: A five-factor model perspective
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/08870440290025858
复制
发表时间：
2002-10-01
影响因子：
3.3
通讯作者：
Denollet, J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
De Fruyt, F;Denollet, J
本研究考察了D型(高负性情感和高社会抑制)在人格五因素模型(FFM)中的地位。对155名健康受试者进行D型量表和NEO-FFI测试，评估FFM特征。受试者还填写了一般健康问卷和工作压力调查。负性情感与神经质呈正相关(0.74)，与尽责性(-0.38)、宜人性(-0.37)、外向性(-0.35)呈负相关。社交抑制与外倾性(-0.61)、严谨性(-0.40)呈负相关，与神经质(0.50)呈正相关。与非D型受试者相比，D型受试者表现出更多的躯体痛苦(p<；0.0001)、焦虑(p<；0.000 1)和抑郁(p<；0.000)。提出了D特质的另一种单维度表征，将其概念化为从神经质内向和稳定外向之间的维度，前者责任性相对较低，后者责任性相对较高。这些发现是在心理学对个体差异的类型表征与维度表征重新产生兴趣的情况下讨论的。
This study investigated the position of Type D (high Negative Affectivity and high Social Inhibition) within the Five-Factor Model (FFM) of personality. A sample of 155 healthy subjects were administered the Type D Scale and the NEO-FFI, assessing the FFM traits. Subjects also filled out the General Health Questionnaire and the Job Stress Survey. Negative Affectivity was positively correlated with Neuroticism (0.74) and negatively with Conscientiousness (-0.38), Agreeableness (-0.37), and Extraversion (-0.35). Social Inhibition was negatively correlated with Extraversion (-0.61) and Conscientiousness (-0.40) and positively with Neuroticism (0.50). Type D subjects reported more somatic distress (p < 0.0001), anxiety (p < 0.000 1) and depression (p < 0.01) than non-Type D subjects. An alternative one-dimensional representation of the D-traits was suggested, conceptualized as a dimension ranging from neurotic introversion with relatively low conscientiousness to stable extraversion with relatively high conscientiousness. These findings are discussed in the light of the renewed interest in psychology for type versus dimensional representations of individual differences.