Self-anchoring and differentiation processes in the minimal group setting
Self-anchoring and differentiation processes in the minimal group setting
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.661
复制
发表时间：
1996-04-01
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
Rothbart, M
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Cadinu, MR;Rothbart, M
在最小组设置组内偏袒被假设为2个过程的函数：一个倾向于基于自我（自我锚定）和倾向于假设一组是相反的其他（分化）的组内判断。在前3个实验中，自我和目标群体的评级顺序是不同的，分类和未分类的参与者被告知一组的特质信息，并要求估计这些特质在另一组的水平。内组法官倾向于对自我的基础组评级，而外组和未分类的法官推断这两个群体是彼此相反的。实验4试图通过在不熟悉的维度上给予关于自我或内群体的反馈来直接评估自我和内群体之间的推理方向，发现被试更愿意从自我到内群体而不是从内群体到自我进行概括。
In-group favoritism in the minimal group setting was hypothesized to be a function of 2 processes: a tendency to base in-group judgments on the self (self-anchoring) and a tendency to assume 1 group to be the opposite of the other (differentiation). In the first 3 experiments, in which the order of rating the self and target group was varied, categorized and uncategorized participants were given trait information about 1 group and were asked to estimate the level of those traits in the other group. In-group judges tended to base group ratings on the self whereas out-group and uncategorized judges inferred the 2 groups to be opposite of one another. Experiment 4 attempted to directly assess the direction of inference between self and in-group by giving feedback about self or in-group on unfamiliar dimensions and found that participants were more willing to generalize from self to in-group than from in-group to self.