Lower pole I: A prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis - Initial results

Lower pole I: A prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis - Initial results
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65508-5
复制
发表时间:
2001-12-01
期刊:
影响因子:
6.6
通讯作者:
Woods, JR
Woods, JR
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Albala, DM;Assimos, DG;Woods, JR

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:确定冲击波碎石和经皮取石治疗有症状的下极肾结石的疗效。 材料和方法:进行了一项前瞻性随机、多中心临床试验,比较了冲击波碎石和经皮取石治疗有症状的下极肾结石 30 mm。结果:在参与研究的 128 名患者中,有 60 名患者的平均结石尺寸为 14.43 毫米。随机接受经皮结石清除术(58 名接受治疗,2 名等待治疗),其中 68 名平均结石尺寸为 14.03 毫米。随机接受冲击波碎石术(64 人接受治疗,4 人等待治疗)。 88% 的治疗患者可进行 3 个月的随访。术后 3 个月的总体无石率,经皮碎石术为 95%,而碎石术为 37%(p
Purpose: The efficacy of shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous stone removal for the treatment of symptomatic lower pole renal calculi was determined.Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized, multicenter clinical trial was performed comparing shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous stone removal for symptomatic lower pole only renal calculi 30 mm. or less.Results: Of 128 patients enrolled in the study 60 with a mean stone size of 14.43 mm. were randomized to percutaneous stone removal (58 treated, 2 awaiting treatment) and 68 with a mean stone size of 14.03 mm. were randomized to shock wave lithotripsy (64 treated, 4 awaiting treatment). Followup at 3 months was available for 88% of treated patients. The 3-month postoperative stone-free rates overall were 95% for percutaneous removal versus 37% lithotripsy (p