Emergency medicine staff's perception of SimWars: A Singapore view
Emergency medicine staff's perception of SimWars: A Singapore view
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/2010105815598417
复制
发表时间：
2015-09-01
影响因子：
0.5
通讯作者：
Kowitlawakul, Yanika
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Dong, Chaoyan;Goswami, Rahul;Kowitlawakul, Yanika
背景：SimWars是医疗保健提供者团队在观众面前进行的舞台竞争。参与者展示沟通，团队合作，临床管理和解决问题的能力。结束后，评委们将听取参与者的临床行动和团队动态。目的：新加坡急诊医学学会于2014年举办了首届SimWars。本研究调查了SimWars是否有效地教授急诊医学人员，探讨了SimWars的竞争性质如何影响参与者的表现和学习，并确定了在新加坡有效实施SimWars的策略。方法：由于问题的探索性，选择了描述性定性设计。结果：（1）22人中有21人认为SimWars对学习有用;（2）19人中有14人认为SimWars与临床实践相比更接近临床实践;（3）19人中有16人认为竞争会引起参与者的压力并提高表现;（4）19人中有14人认为SimWars对学习有用;（5）19人中有14人认为SimWars与临床实践相比更接近临床实践。（4）22人中有16人认为《模拟战争》在心理上是安全的;（5）18人认为团队合作得很好;（6）19人认为任务报告通过澄清、讨论和反思帮助他们改进;任务报告应该个性化，更长，更有条理，更详细，更私密;（7）13人表示他们在内容领域的知识和技能将发生变化; 21人表示他们所学到的将转移到临床实践中;（8）SimWars的有用部分包括在压力下练习，汇报，团队合作和批判性思维;（9）未来的改进包括避免技术问题和提供明确的指导方针。结论：我们的受访者认为SimWars对专业发展是有效的。
Background: SimWars is an onstage competition among teams of health care providers in front of an audience. Participants demonstrate communication, teamwork, clinical management, and problem-solving skills. Upon completion, judges debrief participants' clinical actions and team dynamics.Purpose: The Society for Emergency Medicine in Singapore hosted the inaugural SimWars in 2014. This study investigated whether SimWars was effective in teaching emergency medicine staff, explored how the competitive nature of SimWars affected the performance and learning of participants, and identified strategies to implement SimWars effectively in Singapore. Methods: A descriptive qualitative design was selected owing to the exploratory nature of the questions. Thirteen SimWars participants, six audiences, and three judges participated in the study.Results: (1) Twenty-one out of 22 considered SimWars useful for learning; (2) 14 out of 19 agreed that SimWars closely resemble clinical practice compared to clinical practice; (3) 16 out of 19 agreed that competition induced stress from participants and enhanced performance; (4) 16 out of 22 said SimWars was psychologically safe; (5) 18 said the team worked well together; (6) 19 said that debriefing helped them to improve through clarification, discussion, and reflection; debriefing should be personalized, longer, more structured, more detailed, and in a more private manner; (7) 13 said their knowledge and skills on the content areas will change; 21 said what they learned will be transferred to clinical practice; (8) the useful parts of SimWars included practicing under stress, debriefing, teamwork, and critical thinking; and (9) future improvements included avoiding technical problems and providing clear guidelines.Conclusion: Our responders perceived SimWars to be effective for professional development.