Maximilian P. E. Groszmann’s alternative approach to the classification of “atypical” children in the early twentieth-century United States
Maximilian P. E. Groszmann’s alternative approach to the classification of “atypical” children in the early twentieth-century United States
复制标题
Maximilian P. E. Groszmann 对 20 世纪初美国“非典型”儿童分类的替代方法
DOI:
10.1080/00309230.2021.2013905
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
0.5
通讯作者:
Yoshii Ryo
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
北畑彩子・吉井涼・松井 雄一;上山瑠津子・山田真世・森美智代・山西正記・吉井涼;吉井涼・北畑彩子・松井雄一;Yoshii Ryo
The identification, diagnosis, and categorisation of students who qualified for special education have created long-standing controversy. This article explores Maximilian P.E. Groszmann’s measurement practices, which were intended to facilitate instruction in the early twentieth-century United States. In 1900, Groszmann established a private residential school for “atypical” children and developed his own method of measuring these children’s capabilities, an alternative to the Binet scale. “Atypical” children were defined as those who deviated from the average human type but had the potential of a “normal” child. Thus, they were children who were classified between normal and abnormal. Groszmann’s methods were based on his conviction that “atypical” children’s development was closely and intricately related to their social environment. His holistic perception of “atypical” children’s development led Groszmann to try to take a wider view of their difficulties, reactions, and experiences. Groszmann’s answers to the questions of what, where, and why to measure children differed from those of advocates of intelligence testing. In short, his methods were intended to help children adapt to their social environment, not to label and sort them as “atypical” or socially incapable.